19 Jan 2022 | Written by: Sibby | Please share and subscribe

Join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

I have recently been offered another contract that involved me being drawn on from a pool of subject matter experts to deliver face-to-face training in a specialty field as needed across NSW.

This is yet another employer which has been forced to mandate vaccines to its workers by a certain date. Obviously, I cannot comply, and as a result an option was offered to me, that if I provided an exemption, my services would be engaged regardless.

The interesting thing about the exemption is, it has to be completed by the doctor on the stipulated NSW government documentation, and also has to be signed off by the Chief Health Officer of NSW. This puts an interesting spin on this of course, as there would be very few doctors, who would be prepared to complete these exemptions, knowing that this would then have to be signed off by the CHO and they would consequently be registered as a doctor that issued such an exemption. That’s what I call ‘sticking your neck out’!

I have previously lost 4 other critical contracts due to the very same mandates, and it is now getting to the stage where I cannot afford to lose another contract. Obviously, we need to all pay bills, and eventually when bills are not paid, there are dire consequences.

I was also aware from previous conversations with my doctor, that he had ‘considerable pressure from TGA’ (Therapeutic Goods Administration) and there was a very narrow window of circumstances under which they could issue such exemptions.

I decided to once more send an email, and in detail explain my predicament, also highlighting the fact that I had recently had some adverse and anaphylactic reactions to paralyses ticks. Further, I explained, that I needed to be able to fulfil this contract in order to make ends meet.

I was in no doubt what the response would be, however felt I needed to explore this option one more time, only to receive the following email from my doctor:

Dear Sibby,
I can understand your concerns but the only way to get an exemption is to see an allergy specialist who will then be able to document the allergies. You may find it useful to see the specialist who looked after you following the tick anaphylaxis.
I am afraid I cannot write up exemptions because of the restraints the government has put on this. But an allergy specialist might be able to do so.
Hope this helps,

So here we are; get the vaccine and risk adverse side effects or even death, or don’t get work and eventually starve. Those are your choices.

I decided to respond and remind them, that not only had there been a recent case lodged in the International Criminal Court in The Hague with regards to the toxicity and side effects of the vaccines, and a criminal investigation had commenced in the UK with regards to the very same vaccines, but I reminded them also of the medical oath that he and his colleagues would have taken when they had been admitted into the medical profession.

At the time of being admitted as a member of the medical profession:

I solemnly pledge to consecrate my life to the service of humanity;

I will give to my teachers the respect and gratitude that is their due;

I will practise my profession with conscience and dignity;

The health of my patient will be my first consideration;

I will respect the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;

I will maintain, by all the means in my power, the honour and the noble traditions of the medical profession;

My colleagues will be my sisters and brothers;

I will not permit considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

I will maintain the utmost respect for human life;

I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;

I make these promises solemnly, freely and upon my honour.

I believe it is time to remind the medical profession of this oath, and the government, that we will not be dictated to about a substance that puts our health at risk!

Hold the line!

The question is when did doctors prostitute themselves to the Government and Big Pharma?

19 views0 comments

January 18 2022 | Frank Ziovas | Please share and subscribe join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

For the last 4 weeks I have been saying to people, that the ‘energies’ are at tipping point, and I can feel something is about to happen that will change the current state of the world and where we are headed. This feeling has become more intense in the last 2 weeks, and no matter what I did, I could not shake it.

The movement of knowledge and people’s awareness has changed exponentially over the last 4 weeks. We are seeing protests all over the world, and people are starting to wake up to the fact, that they have complied with government mandates, been locked up for extended periods of time, had their 2 vaccines and possible boosters, but are still now having to wear masks, face restrictions and, according to the latest ‘science’, are still catching and transmitting the virus - whichever variant is the latest flavour put out by the ‘fear media’.

Those of us in the know of course have always been hyper-aware that this has never been about health or protecting us, this has always been about control, the great reset and wealth redistribution. We have known, that behind the health pandemic a crime beyond comprehension was being hidden. A crime so ambitious in fact, that most people dare not think it possible, hiding their head in the sand, and going along with the government agendas simply because that is the easiest option. And here we have it; the verdict of the International Common Law Court of Justice, naming 75 individuals complicit of these crimes, associated arrest warrants and warrants for seizure and expropriation, which will see the individuals not only rotting in jail for the terms of their natural lives, but also stripped of their assets and their corporations dismantled. Among those noteworthy, are the CEOs of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals and Glaxo Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals, the Pope and Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England. Yes, indeed, you read correctly!

The legal action was brought on by the Canadian citizens and the 18-page verdict details the extent of the crimes, which are beyond comprehension. You should be warned, as even I, who has been exposed to many gruesome details and documents over the last 24 months, was affected emotionally when reading it. It is not for the light-hearted.

Whilst this is not the usual court pathway, it is in essence a common law ‘people’s court’ for one of a better word, established and conducted in an ethical manner, with an appointed judge and rules of evidence applied to the evidence presented. It has in fact been a detailed and thorough process that has taken close to 5 months to bring to closure.

This court process has also managed to achieve the removal of Pope Benedict in 2013 and others associated, so perhaps this particular process should not be underestimated. This verdict could be viewed as a bit of a ‘toothless tiger’ and as with anything, how do you achieve court compliance with a verdict, when there is the possibility that police and other authorities may not be operating on the same side of the law. Let’s face it, even Scott Morrison has not complied with conventional court and AAT directives with regards to producing evidence. So, what hope do we really have?

It should however build confidence with people, that the justice system is working for the people and is starting to move, uncovering the truth and the extent of the crimes are starting to coming to light. The verdict will be particularly hard hitting for the people who were coerced to take the vaccines or who chose to take the vaccines, led to believe by governments that this was for their health and others, as the extent of these poisons dawns on their consciousness. The “vaccines” have been called ‘weapons of mass genocide’ in the court verdict and were produced purely to control population numbers and growth, causing deaths, long term illnesses and side effects, still births and infertility to name a few. The fallout of which will be seen for years to come. The court verdict and details contained within, will take a while for the vaccinated and ‘Covidians’ to digest.

Of course, there are other court actions pending and ready to be lodged by various parties, which we will share with you in further posts. But at this stage, it appears the dominos are starting to fall as more and more information surfaces.

Download the verdict below

Download PDF • 644KB

86 views0 comments

Press Release: Australian Citizens Party

Please subscribe and Share; Join our Telegram Channel https://t.me/seetvnews

Tell Morrison today to demand Biden release this war crime-exposing Australian journalist.

The British court ruling last week upholding the USA’s appeal on extraditing Julian Assange is the final straw. The US and UK pro-war faction, and their Australian apologists, want to kill the Australian journalist who exposed their war crimes; indeed, Assange has just suffered a stroke from the stress he is enduring—Australians must not stand for it. According to Assange’s legal team, advocacy by the Australian government would have made the difference when Donald Trump considered pardoning Assange back in January, and it would still make the difference, but the government hasn’t bothered. It’s time for all Australians to stand up and demand our political leaders grow a spine and tell Joe Biden in no uncertain terms to let Assange go.

Hit the phones! All concerned Australians should make three phone calls today—to PM Scott Morrison, Foreign Minister Marise Payne, and Defence Minister Peter Dutton—to demand they tell their British and American counterparts to end the persecution of Assange immediately. (See contact details below.)

The official narrative about Assange is a tissue of lies. Assange’s only crime was exposing that our “side” commits war crimes and covers them up. For two decades the USA and UK, with Australia always in tow, have weaponised “human rights” to conduct permanent warfare in the guise of “interventions”, fueled by a never-ending stream of accusations of crimes against humanity by so-called “authoritarian regimes”. WikiLeaks exposed that the real crimes against humanity were the resulting endless wars, and it exposed the inner workings of the intelligence-diplomatic-military-corporate machinery that orchestrated these wars. It also exposed the cover-ups of horrific war crimes committed by our side, which gave the lie to the Anglo-American sanctimony over human rights. If WikiLeaks had not released the “Collateral Murder” video of US helicopter gunships cooly but murderously gunning down two Reuters journalists and their companions in Iraq, it would likely still be covered up to this day.

The US charges against Julian Assange are false:

  • He did not “hack” classified documents, in breach of the US Espionage Act; he published documents leaked to him by Chelsea Manning, who served time for her crime before US President Barack Obama commuted her sentence in 2017. Essentially, except for being the first to publish, what Assange did was no different to many major media outlets all over the world which published the same documents, sourced from WikiLeaks. In June 2021, the only witness supporting the US charge of espionage, convicted serial paedophile and financial fraudster Sigurdur Ingi Thordarson, admitted in an interview with Icelandic newspaper Stundin that his “evidence” is a lie.

  • He did not put lives at risk; rather, he carefully vetted the documents and even called the US State Department in 2011 to forewarn them when WikiLeaks lost control of some diplomatic cables that were about to be published. Australian journalist Mark Davis was present in the WikiLeaks bunker when Assange released the Afghanistan war documents in 2010, and he testifies that Assange took great care to redact the documents so as to remove sensitive identifying information about US agents. This accusation is a hypocritical smokescreen, however, as, in truth, Assange was exposing the lies about the wars that were really to blame for mass death and destruction.

Australia’s treatment of Julian Assange has been deeply shameful. From the beginning, Australian politicians and media marched in lockstep with the USA and denounced Assange for exposing the Anglo-American war machine. In 2010, then-PM Julia Gillard called his publishing of leaked documents “illegal”—an extraordinary claim given that publishing leaked documents has always been a cornerstone of real journalism. To this day high-profile Australian mainstream media journalists snidely insist that Assange is not a journalist, simply because he exposed the war lies that they had faithfully regurgitated and never questioned. Successive Australian governments have gone through the motions of providing Assange with the bare minimum consular assistance, while effectively sacrificing this Australian citizen to their subservient strategic relationship to the United States.

The only politician who has consistently advocated for Assange has been former Australian intelligence official and Tasmanian Independent MP Andrew Wilkie. In recent years, however, Wilkie has been joined by a growing band of MPs, including Queensland LNP MP and co-chair of the Bring Julian Assange Home Parliamentary Group, George Christensen, Greens Senator Peter Whish-Wilson, Labor MP Julian Hill, and more than a dozen others, to pressure the Australian government to act for Assange. A sign of the turning tide is that prominent Labor politicians who toed the line behind Julia Gillard in 2010, including former PM and Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, former NSW Premier and Foreign Minister Bob Carr, and current Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese, have now switched to call for the persecution of Assange to end. And Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce, chair of the National Security Committee of Cabinet, is now also calling for Assange not to be extradited to the USA.

Stand up!

Concerned Australians must direct their justified anger over the persecution of Assange at the right place, which is the Australian government politicians who are in a position to demand Joe Biden release him. Starting today, everyone telephone the PM, Foreign Minister, and Defence Minister to deliver the message that they will be held politically responsible for the fate of Julian Assange. Tell them they must immediately contact the US and UK governments to demand they let Assange go.

Contact details:

Prime Minister Scott Morrison

Parliament: 02 6277 7700 Electorate: 02 9523 0339

Foreign Minister Marise Payne

Parliament: 02 6277 7500 Electorate: 02 9687 8755

Defence Minister Peter Dutton

Parliament: 02 6277 7800 Electorate: 07 3205 9977

17 views0 comments