Updated: Sep 1, 2021
Source Gary Allan
Chapter 1 - Don't Confuse Me With Facts
Most of us have had the experience, either as parents or youngsters, of trying to
discover the "hidden picture" within another picture in a children's magazine. Usually
you are shown a landscape with trees, bushes, flowers and other bits of nature.
The caption reads something like this: "Concealed somewhere in this picture is a donkey
pulling a cart with a boy in it. Can you find them?" Try as you might, usually you
could not find the hidden picture until you turned to a page farther back in the
magazine which would reveal how cleverly the artist had hidden it from us. If we
study the landscape we realize that the whole picture was painted in such a way as to
conceal the real picture within, and once we see the "real picture," it stands out like
the proverbial painful digit.
We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for
us which deliberately hide the real picture. In this book we will show you how to
discover the "hidden picture" in the landscapes presented to us daily through
newspapers, radio and television. Once you can see through the camouflage, you will
see the donkey, the cart and the boy who have been there all along.
Millions of Americans are concerned and frustrated over mishappenings in our nation.
They feel that something is wrong, drastically wrong, but because of the picture
painters they can't quite put their fingers on it.
Maybe you are one of those persons. Something is bugging you, but you aren't sure
what. We keep electing new Presidents who seemingly promise faithfully to halt the
world-wide Communist advance, put the blocks to extravagant government spending,
douse the fires of inflation, put the economy on an even keel, reverse the trend which
is turning the country into a moral sewer, and toss the criminals into the hoosegow
where they belong. Yet, despite high hopes and glittering campaign promises, these
problems continue to worsen no matter who is in office. Each new administration,
whether it be Republican or Democrat, continues the same basic policies of the
previous administration which it had so thoroughly denounced during the election
campaign. It is considered poor form to mention this, but it is true nonetheless. Is
there a plausible reason to explain why this happens? We are not supposed to think so.
We are supposed to think it is all accidental and coincidental and that therefore there
is nothing we can do about it.
FDR once said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it
was planned that way." He was in a good position to know. We believe that many of
the major world events that are shaping our destinies occur because somebody or
somebodies have planned them that way. If we were merely dealing with the law of
averages, half of the events affecting our nation's well-being should be good for
America. If we were dealing with mere incompetence, our leaders should occasionally
make a mistake in our favor. We shall attempt to prove that we are not really dealing
with coincidence or stupidity, but with planning and brilliance. This small book deals
with that planning and brilliance and how it has shaped the foreign and domestic
policies of the last six administrations. We hope it will explain matters which have up
to now seemed inexplicable; that it will bring into sharp focus images which have
been obscured by the landscape painters of the mass media.
Those who believe that major world events result from planning are laughed at for
believing in the "conspiracy theory of history." Of course, no one in this modern day
and age really believes in the conspiracy theory of history -except those who have
taken the time to study the subject. When you think about it, there are really only two
theories of history. Either things happen by accident neither planned nor caused by
anybody, or they happen because they are planned and somebody causes them to
happen. In reality, it is the "accidental theory of history" preached in the unhallowed
Halls of Ivy which should be ridiculed. Otherwise, why does every recent
administration make the same mistakes as the previous ones? Why do they repeat the
errors of the past which produce inflation, depressions and war? Why does our State
Department "stumble" from one Communist-aiding "blunder" to another? If you
believe it is all an accident or the result of mysterious and unexplainable tides of
history, you will be regarded as an "intellectual" who understands that we live in a
complex world. If you believe that something like 32,496 consecutive coincidences
over the past forty years stretches the law of averages a bit, you are a kook!
Why is it that virtually all "reputable" scholars and mass media columnists and
commentators reject the cause and effect or conspiratorial theory of history?
Primarily, most scholars follow the crowd in the academic world just as most women
follow fashions. To buck the tide means social and professional ostracism. The same
is true of the mass media. While professors and pontificators profess to be tolerant
and broadminded, in practice it's strictly a one way street-with all traffic flowing left.
A Maoist can be tolerated by Liberals of Ivory Towerland or by the Establishment's
media pundits, but to be a conservative, and a conservative who propounds a
conspiratorial view, is absolutely verboten. Better you should be a drunk at a national
Secondly, these people have over the years acquired a strong vested emotional interest
in their own errors. Their intellects and egos are totally committed to the accidental
theory. Most people are highly reluctant to admit that they have been conned or have
shown poor judgment. To inspect the evidence of the existence of a conspiracy
guiding our political destiny from behind the scenes would force many of these
people to repudiate a lifetime of accumulated opinions. It takes a person with strong
character indeed to face the facts and admit he has been wrong even if it was because
he was uninformed.
Such was the case with the author of this book. It was only because he set out to prove
the conservative anti-Communists wrong that he happened to end up writing this
book. His initial reaction to the conservative point of view was one of suspicion and
hostility; and it was only after many months of intensive research that he had to admit
that he had been "conned."
Politicians and "intellectuals" are attracted to the concept that events are propelled by
some mysterious tide of history or happen by accident. By this reasoning they hope to
escape the blame when things go wrong.
Most intellectuals, pseudo and otherwise, deal with the conspiratorial theory of
history simply by ignoring it. They never attempt to refute the evidence. It can't be
refuted. If and when the silent treatment doesn't work, these "objective" scholars and
mass media opinion molders resort to personal attacks, ridicule and satire. The
personal attacks tend to divert attention from the facts which an author or speaker is
trying to expose. The idea is to force the person exposing the conspiracy to stop the
exposure and spend his time and effort defending himself.
However, the most effective weapons used against the conspiratorial theory of history
are ridicule and satire. These extremely potent weapons can be cleverly used to avoid
any honest attempt at refuting the facts. After all, nobody likes to be made fun of.
Rather than be ridiculed most people will keep quiet; and, this subject certainly does
lend itself to ridicule and satire. One technique which can be used is to expand the
conspiracy to the extent it becomes absurd. For instance, our man from the Halls of
Poison Ivy might say in a scoffingly arrogant tone, "I suppose you believe every
liberal professor gets a telegram each morning from conspiracy headquarters
containing his orders for the day's brainwashing of his students?" Some
conspiratorialists do indeed overdraw the picture by expanding the conspiracy (from
the small clique which it is) to include every local knee-jerk liberal activist and
government bureaucrat. Or, because of racial or religious bigotry, they will take small
fragments of legitimate evidence and expand them into a conclusion that will support
their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally "Jewish," "Catholic," or
"Masonic." These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but, sadly play into the
hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are screwballs.
"Intellectuals" are fond of mouthing clichés like "The conspiracy theory is often
tempting. However, it is overly simplistic." To ascribe absolutely everything that
happens to the machinations of a small group of power hungry conspirators is overly
simplistic. But, in our opinion nothing is more simplistic than doggedly holding onto
the accidental view of major world events.
In most cases Liberals simply accuse all those who discuss the conspiracy of being
paranoid. "Ah, you right wingers," they say, "rustling every bush, kicking over every
rock, looking for imaginary boogeymen." Then comes the coup de grace-labeling the
conspiratorial theory as the "devil theory of history." The Liberals love that one. Even
though it is an empty phrase, it sounds so sophisticated!
With the leaders of the academic and communications world assuming this sneering
attitude towards the conspiratorial (or cause and effect) theory of history, it is not
surprising that millions of innocent and well-meaning people, in a natural desire not to
appear naive, assume the attitudes and repeat the clichés of the opinion makers. These
persons, in their attempt to appear sophisticated, assume their mentors' air of smug
superiority even though they themselves have not spent five minutes in study on the
subject of international conspiracy.
The "accidentalists" would have us believe that ascribing any of our problems to
planning is 'simplistic" and all our problems are caused by Poverty, Ignorance and
Disease--hereinafter abbreviated as FID. They ignore the fact that organized
conspirators use PID, real and imagined, as an excuse to build a jail for us all. Most of
the world has been in PID since time immemorial and it takes incredibly superficial
thinking to ascribe the ricocheting of the United States government from one disaster
to another over the past thirty years to PID. "Accidentalists" ignore the fact that some
of the more advanced nations in the world have been captured by Communists.
Czechoslovakia was one of the world's most modern industrial nations and Cuba had
the second highest per capita income of any nation in Central and South America. It is
not true, however, to state that there are no members of the intellectual elite who
subscribe to the conspiratorial theory of history. For example, there is Professor
Carroll Quigley of the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University. Professor
Quigley can hardly be accused of being a "right wing extremist." (Those three words
have been made inseparable by the mass media.) Dr. Quigley has all the "liberal"
credentials, having taught at the Liberal Establishment's academic Mecca's of
Princeton and Harvard. In his 1300-page, 8 pound tome Tragedy and Hope, Dr,
Quigley reveals the existence of the conspiratorial network which will be discussed in
this book. The Professor is not merely formulating a theory, but revealing this
network's existence from firsthand experience. He also makes it clear that it is only
the network's secrecy and not their goals to which he objects. Professor Quigley
"I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years
and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret
records. I HAVE NO AVERSION TO IT OR TO MOST OF ITS AIMS AND HAVE,
FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, BEEN CLOSE TO IT AND TO MANY OF ITS
INSTRUMENTS. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its
policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that IT WISHES TO
REMAIN UNKNOWN, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be
known." (Emphasis added)
We agree, its role in history does deserve to be known. That is why we have written
this book. However, we most emphatically disagree with this network's aim which the
Professor describes as "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control
in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the
economy of the world as a whole." In other words, this power mad clique wants to
control and rule the world. Even more-frightening, they want total control over all
individual actions. As Professor Quigley observes: "... his [the individual's] freedom
and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will
be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training,
his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and
medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits." It wants control
over all natural resources, business, banking and transportation by controlling the
governments of the world. In order to accomplish these aims the conspirators have
had no qualms about fomenting wars, depressions and hatred. They want a monopoly
which would eliminate all competitors and destroy the free enterprise system. And
Professor Quigley, of Harvard, Princeton and Georgetown approves!
Professor Quigley is not the only academic who is aware of the existence of a clique
of serf-perpetuating conspirators whom we shall call Insiders. Other honest scholars
finding the same individuals at the scenes of disastrous political fires over and over
again have concluded that there is obviously an organization of pyromaniacs at work
in the world. But these intellectually honest scholars realize that if they challenged the
Insiders head-on, their careers would be destroyed. The author knows these men exist
because he has been in contact with some of them.
There are also religious leaders who are aware of the existence of this conspiracy. In a
UPI story dated December 27, 1965, Father Pedro Arrupe, head of the Jesuit Order of
the Roman Catholic Church, made the following charges during his remarks to the
"This .. . Godless society operates in an extremely efficient manner at least in its
higher levels of leadership. It makes use of every possible means at its disposal, be
they scientific, technical, social or economic. It follows a perfectly mapped-out
strategy. It holds almost complete sway in international organizations, in financial
circles, in the field of mass communications; press, cinema, radio and television."
There are a number of problems to be overcome in convincing a person of the
possible existence of a conspiratorial clique of Insiders who from the very highest
levels manipulate government policy. In this case truth is really stranger than fiction.
We are dealing with history's greatest "whodunit," a mystery thriller which puts Erie
Stanley Gardner to shame. If you love a mystery, you'll be fascinated with the study
of the operations of the Insiders. If you do study this network of which Professor
Quigley speaks, you will find that what had at first seemed incredible not only exists,
but heavily influences our lives.
It must be remembered that the first job of any conspiracy, whether it be in politics,
crime or within a business office, is to convince everyone else that no conspiracy
exists. The conspirators success will be determined largely by their ability to do this.
That the elite of the academic world and mass communications media always pooh-
pooh the existence of the Insiders merely serves to camouflage their operations. These
"artists" hide the boy, the cart and the donkey.
Probably at some time you have been involved with or had personal knowledge of
some event which was reported in the news. Perhaps it concerned an athletic event, an
election, a committee or your business. Did the report contain the "real" story, the
story behind the story? Probably not. And for a variety of reasons. The reporter had
time and space problems and there is a good chance the persons involved deliberately
did not reveal all the facts. Possibly the reporter's own prejudices governed what facts
went into the story and which were deleted. Our point is that most people know from
personal experience that a news story often is not the whole story. But many of us
assume that our own case is unique when really it is typical. What is true about the
reporting of local events is equally as true about the reporting of national and
Psychological problems are also involved in inducing people to look at the evidence
concerning the Insiders. People are usually comfortable with their old beliefs and
conceptions. When Columbus told people the world was a ball and not a pancake,
they were highly upset. They were being asked to reject their way of thinking of a
lifetime and adopt a whole new outlook. The "intellectuals" of the day scoffed at
Columbus and people were afraid they would lose social prestige if they listened to
him. Many others just did not want to believe the world was round. It complicated too
many things. And typical flat-earthers had such a vested interest involving their own
egos, that they heaped abuse on Columbus for challenging their view of the universe.
"Don't confuse us with facts; our minds are made up," they said.
These same factors apply today. Because the Establishment controls the media,
anyone exposing the Insiders will be the recipient of a continuous fusillade of
invective from newspapers, magazines, TV and radio. In this manner one is
threatened with loss of "social respectability" if he dares broach the idea that there is
organization behind any of the problems currently wracking America. Unfortunately,
for many people social status comes before intellectual honesty. Although they would
never admit it, social position is more important to many people than is the survival of
freedom in America.
If you ask these people which is more important- social respectability or saving their
children from slavery -they will tell you the latter, of course. But their actions (or lack
of same) speak so much louder than their words. People have an infinite capacity for
rationalization when it comes to refusing to face the threat to America's survival.
Deep down these people are afraid they may be laughed at if they take a stand, or may
be denied an invitation to some social climber's cocktail party. Instead of getting mad
at the Insiders, these people actually get angry at those who are trying to save the
country by exposing the conspirators.
One thing which makes it so hard for some socially minded people to assess the
conspiratorial evidence objectively is that the conspirators come from the very highest
social strata. They are immensely wealthy, highly educated and extremely cultured.
Many of them have lifelong reputations for philanthropy. Nobody enjoys being put in
the position of accusing prominent people of conspiring to enslave their fellow
Americans, but the facts are inescapable. Many business and professional people axe
particularly vulnerable to the "don't jeopardize your social respectability" pitch given
by those who don't want the conspiracy exposed. The Insiders know that if the
business and professional community will not take a stand to save the private
enterprise system, the socialism through which they intend to control the world will
be inevitable. They believe that most business and professional men are too shallow
and decadent, too status conscious, too tied up in the problems of their jobs and
businesses to worry about what is going on in politics. These men are told that it
might be bad for business or jeopardize their government contracts if they take a
stand. They have been bribed into silence with their own tax monies!
We are hoping that the conspirators have underestimated the courage and patriotism
remaining in the American people. We feel there are a sufficient number of you who
are not mesmerized by the television set, who put God, family and country above
social status, who will band together to expose and destroy the conspiracy of the
Insiders. The philosopher Diogenes scoured the length and breadth of ancient Greece
searching for an honest man. We are scouring the length and breadth of America in
search of hundreds of thousands of intellectually honest men and women who are
willing to investigate facts and come to logical conclusions-no matter how unpleasant
those conclusions may be.