• Home

  • About SeeTVNews

  • All News

  • Australian News

  • World News

  • Business

  • Sports News

  • Health

  • Videos

  • Crypto Currency

  • Precious Metals

  • Genral Information

  • Contact

  • Advertise

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    imageonline-co-transparentimage (6).png

    News, Business, Sport and Opinion Blogs

    • YouTube
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • All Posts
    • Australian News
    • US News
    • Victoria
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Our View
    • Podcasts
    • Sport
    • Health
    • Videos
    • Informational Video
    • Opinion Pieces
    • Sports News
    • Futsal_Serie_A Women
    • Latest News From Europe
    • World News
    • Crypto Currency
    • Precious Metals, Gold & Silver
    • General Information
    • Formula 1
    • Serie A
    • Football
    • Survival
    Search
    • Frank Ziovas
      • Feb 14
      • 3 min read

    Viennese child psychiatrists bring a danger report

    15 Feb 2022 | SEETVNEWS | Please join our Telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews



    The staff shortage is no longer acceptable, criticize eleven doctors from the child and adolescent psychiatric clinic in Hietzing. The health association knows the problem - throughout Austria.


    Eleven doctors in child and adolescent psychiatry at the Hietzing Clinic are sounding the alarm due to the overload - exacerbated by the pandemic. The doctors have brought in a hazard report to draw attention to the situation. The health association confirmed a corresponding report by the "Kurier" on Wednesday. One is aware of this problem. Additional posts were only made last year.


    An overload, structural defect or hazard notification is a detailed description of the facts that can be used to draw the attention of supervisors to problems. This should always be done when it is foreseeable that the work can no longer be carried out on your own in such a way that damage - as in the specific case at the expense of the patient's health - or work or other contractual injuries can be ruled out be able. Due to the lack of staff and the massive increase in the number of patients, the eleven psychiatrists at the clinic on the Rosenhügel site have now filed such a complaint.


    "Situations that are negligent for everyone involved"

    According to "Kurier", the doctors point out that the situation can no longer be managed with the existing resources. "We no longer want to get ourselves into situations that are ultimately negligent for everyone involved," the newspaper quoted from the ad. The bottlenecks had already been pointed out in the summer, but there was no improvement. The indicators demand more staff from the management, if this is not possible, they were asked to prioritize their tasks - for example in acute care.


    The health association is aware of the shortage of specialists in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry. It was said that this was not only the case in Vienna, but throughout Austria. Health Minister Wolfgang Mückstein (Greens) only presented an amendment to the doctors' training regulations on Monday, with which the training key is changed. This is intended to counter the lack of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic treatment options for children and adolescents that have become apparent during the pandemic and to train more doctors in this area.


    Additional posts created in 2021

    Even before the overload was reported, "additional posts for the subjects of pediatrics, general medicine and the field of clinical psychology were made available last year to relieve the clinic," the health association said. In addition, there was an increase in the number of permanent posts in the supply-relevant professional groups of doctors, nurses and multi-professional teams, such as psychologists or pedagogues. According to the health association, all existing training positions have been filled.

    In order to relieve the medical profession in the Hietzing Clinic, an additional department for transitional psychiatry was created in the Floridsdorf Clinic with 14 beds for adolescents and young adults in July 2021, the health association stated. However, the situation is no better there. According to "Kurier", not all specialist positions are occupied there in the child and adolescent psychiatric department.

    "The city of Vienna must finally ensure adequate child and adolescent psychiatric care. Capacity must be expanded and human resources increased. How many calls for help will it take before action is finally taken," said ÖVP health spokeswoman Ingrid Korosec. For well over ten years, the Viennese ÖVP has been calling for appropriate reforms in this context. However, no sustainable measures were taken.

    • Australian News
    • •
    • US News
    • •
    • Health
    8 views0 comments
    • Frank Ziovas
      • Feb 7
      • 6 min read

    Ongoing Studies with mRNA Injections on Thousands of Babies and Children....

    7 Feb 2022 Please join our Telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

    Please subscribe and share


    Every good mum and dad only wants the best for the child - organic carrot juice, an organic banana every day, only soft, genuine cotton blankets with an eco-label, toys without evaporating toxins so that the child can thrive. The panic media is now working flat out to ensure that the good mums and dads - because they only want the best for their children - allow one or two, maybe even three injections with genetically modified mRNA substances into the children as quickly as possible injected. Where are the questions: "Is this also organic?", or "Does the syringe content come from ecological cultivation?". Panic-stricken, anxious that the offspring will not be ostracized at school or suffer "social disadvantages", one forgets to ask all these which seems to be quite important when buying a toy. "


    The mRNA injections have so-called "conditional approvals", which means that they are neither fully developed nor is the effect profile known in the various population groups, not even in the "smallest". Even worse: You are still looking for the "right dose" in the composition, and you still have a lot of questions that are only to be answered by ongoing studies.

    According to clinicaltrials.gov worldwide, there are currently 115 studies in children from the age of 6 months (!) in connection with Covid-19 and the experimental mRNA injections. This involves different questions, because you are in experimental phase 1, 2 or 3. Phase 1 means you have no idea how the substance could work - and that's the case with many questions!


    A study on children aged 5-11 that is being carried out at the Rabin Medical Center in Israel should be mentioned here as an example. When you think of Israel, you think of the descendants of the Holocaust. Yes, that's where children's studies are done! In six months - from December 30, 2021 to June 30, 2022 - they want to find out whether the children are producing antibodies - because, until now, we don't know! Could be - but also might not be.... The official study title is: "REAL SARS-CoV-2 ANTIBODY RESPONSE IN CHILDREN AGED 5-11 YEARS AFTER BNT162b2 mRNA VACCINATION: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY" on 150 participants. Rabin Medical Center advertises itself as the largest heart center in Israel, and among others the national center for difficult pregnancy and childbirth, as well as a specialist in genetic tests and genetic investigations. Here they are planning to carry out Covid-19 mRNA injection studies in children, because - according to the introductory text to the study it says:


    "There is little data on the immunogenicity of Pfizer-Biontec's BNT162b2 vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 disease and on side effects in children aged 5-11 years. Therefore, our goal is to determine the immunogenicity and the Describe local or systemic reactogenicity events following vaccination with the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 5-11 years for a period of six and a half months after the first dose of the vaccine."

    Just to reiterate, read it be overlooked: There is little data on immunogenicity....in children....!!!


    You can get more details yourself at:

    Consult https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05175989?term=COVID-19+vaccine&cond=Vaccine+covid-19&age=0&draw=2 .


    None of the panic prophets on the propaganda frontline told you that, nor did the headmaster who has the vaccination bus pull up in the schoolyard. In this way, children who cannot withstand the peer pressure of the class are forced to consent to an experimental gene injection in order to continue to "belong". Because they cannot possibly recognize and assess the consequences of the mRNA injection! Is it "wise" to use such tactics today - and later a crime against all children?


    Another study by Biontech/Pfizer on a "cohort", as study participants are called, of 11,422 children aged 6 months(!) to 18 years is currently in the "recruitment phase":

    "PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO ASSESS THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY AND PHASE 2/3 PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, OBSERVER-BLIND SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY STUDY OF A SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATE AGAINST COVID- 19 IN HEALTHY CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS"

    Duration of study from March 2021 to May 2026. So in 5 years they might have figured out which dose is the right one?


    In the short summary you can read:


    "This is a Phase 1/2/3 study in healthy children and young adults. Depending on the safety and/or immunogenicity data generated over the course of this study and the resulting risk/benefit assessment, the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 in participants less than 6 months of age will subsequently be assessed."

    More details at:

    https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643?cond=Vaccine+covid-19&age=0&draw=3

    Graphic illustrating the procedure for the dose-finding study:


    Dose-finding study in children and young adults aged 6 months to 18 years

    One has to ask oneself how one can really understand this "study objective"? 11,422 children between the ages of 6 months and 18 years are injected with a gene experiment substance in different doses in order to then be able to estimate how these substances can subsequently be evaluated in babies aged 0-6 months...?! You just rub your eyes when you read that.... is that utter nonsense? mockery? Do parents really want to give up their children for this? Is it even more perfidious? Which "Dr. Experts" came up with this? How much research funding is there for such ethically-morally abysmal, deeply reprehensible "studies" with very questionable goals? Those would be interesting questions that will probably never be answered.

    The trials for this study will be conducted at 94 medical facilities in the US, Finland, Poland and Spain, including children's hospitals. Fourteen "primary objectives" have been defined, including finding out how many babies and children will have "local", "systemic", "adverse events" and "serious adverse events" at what dose. This includes ranging reactions from pain in the arm, fever, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, muscle and joint pain to "serious reactions" that have not been further specified. It is now known that young people like to suffer from heart muscle inflammation after vaccination, but can also die "suddenly and unexpectedly", like a 5-year-old girl, 4 days after the Pfizer injection: https://medalerts.org /vaersdb/findfield.

    One of the "secondary goals" is to find out whether SARS-CoV-2 serum level-neutralizing antibodies, expressed as GMTs, are formed. Results will have to wait until 2026. It may be that the gene experiment material produces the desired results - or not. Until then, the "DrExperts" have their sheep in the dry.


    In the meantime, the propaganda machine will make so much noise that such background studies will not reach the minds of the people who lend their children to the experimenters. You probably never hear about it in the news.


    Only two studies were selected as examples - there are 113 other studies, spread over many institutions, university hospitals, children's hospitals, obstetric facilities, medical centers, etc. in all over the world on children, young adults, which can be found at clinical trial .gov.

    Why don't you ask the doctors exactly what they inject into the children? Ask about liability if your child develops health problems after the vaccination. Ask about blood tests, inflammation levels, oxygen saturation - before the vaccination - after the vaccination, ask how you may have to document and prove vaccination damage.... oblige the doctor to examine your child regularly after the vaccination, the To document the health of the child and possibly pay for extra costs should your child endure health consequences, keep asking... because you want the best for your child! Find out for yourself - and don't leave it to your flat screen TV and the propaganda orchestra - which always sings the same song, educate you about risks and effects. No, there are no "side effects" when children suffer health damage or even die!


    Being aware of all aspects of this is your highly personal task! None of those who are beating the propaganda drum so loudly today will bring your healthy child back to you. The mRNA injections are part of an ongoing live experiment with billions of "laboratory people" (instead of rats) - not only on children, but also on adults - worldwide! who are beating the propaganda drum so loudly today. The mRNA injections are part of an ongoing live experiment with billions of "laboratory people" (instead of rats) - not only on children, but also on adults - worldwide! who are beating the propaganda drum so loudly today. The mRNA injections are part of an ongoing live experiment with billions of "laboratory people" (instead of rats) - not only on children, but also on adults - worldwide!


    At least you should know what you are doing!

    • US News
    • •
    • Australian News
    • •
    • Health
    196 views0 comments
    • Frank Ziovas
      • Jan 29
      • 8 min read

    Google Doesn’t Want You to Research Mass Formation Psychosis

    30 Dec 2022 | Please join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

    Source Google Doesn't Want You to Research Mass Formation Psychosis (mercola.com)


    At the end of 2021, the term “mass formation psychosis” had a value of 0 on Google Trends, meaning there’s not enough data for the term to even make it on the charts. Then, on December 31, Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,1 mentioned it on an episode of The Joe Rogan Experience viewed by more than 50 million people.


    The term, which provides a coherent explanation of why so many people have fallen victim to the unbelievable lies and propaganda of the mainstream COVID-19 narrative, went viral. On January 2, 2022, mass formation psychosis reached a value of 100 on Google Trends,3 which means it had reached peak popularity.


    Google Manipulates Reality Around ‘Mass Formation Psychosis’

    The technocrats quickly took action, adding a rarely seen warning that popped up for those searching the suddenly popular phrase in the early days of 2022. It read, “It looks like these results are changing quickly. If this topic is new, it can sometimes take time for results to be added by reliable sources."


    In reality, the topic is not new. Mattias Desmet, professor of clinical psychology at the University of Ghent in Belgium, who has 126 publications to his name,5 has been studying it for many years, and the phenomenon actually dates back over a hundred years. One of the earliest works on the subject, according to Malone, is an 1841 book titled, “Extraordinary Popular Delusions and The Madness of Crowds,” which details “the irrational behaviors of crowds.”


    You won’t find any of this — at least not easily — if you search on Google for “mass formation psychosis” today, however, as it’s all been effectively buried by Big Tech. What you will find is the results of an orchestrated and carefully vetted links to sites that help control the mainstream narrative around the topic. This not only serves to twist the meaning of the term but also to discredit Malone, a classic Orwellian Doublespeak move.


    The top search results include headlines like “An anti-vaxx scientist said 'mass formation psychosis' caused people to follow COVID-19 measures. Psychologists say there's no such thing,” (Business Insider) and “Fact Check-No evidence of pandemic ‘mass formation psychosis’, say experts speaking to Reuters” (Reuters). Rogan’s interview with Malone was also taken down by YouTube.

    Outrageously, one of the “expert fact checkers” used by the AP to discredit Malone and mass formation psychosis is Jay Van Bavel, a New York University assistant professor of psychology and neural science who not only stated he had never heard of the phrase and could not find it in peer-reviewed literature, but also has encouraged the use of “behavioral science” to “nudge” and “motivate” people to obey the official COVID-19 narrative.9 On January 10, Malone wrote:

    “[T]here has been an amazingly coordinated effort to shoot the messenger and actively character assassinate (or “defenstrate”) me as a surrogate while avoiding any reference to the highly credentialed academic Professor Dr. Mattias Desmet who actually developed the theory and has documented the extensive evidence in an upcoming academic book.
    … In this coordinated propaganda and censorship response, we can clearly see the hands of the BBC-led Trusted News Initiative, the Scientific Technological Elite, the transnational investment funds and their World Economic Forum allies which control Pfizer and most of Big Pharma, Legacy Media and Big Tech (and many national governments) acting in real time to suppress a growing awareness by the general public of having been actively manipulated using crowd psychology tools to generate clinically significant fear and anxiety of COVID-19 (otherwise known as “Coronaphobia”) to advance their agendas on a global scale.”

    What Is Mass Formation Psychosis?

    In the video above, you can see Thomas Patrick Carrigan interview Malone, Desmet and board-certified internist and cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough about mass formation psychosis. Don’t be confused by the term mass, it is just psychological speak for crowd. Crowd formation is the same as mass formation.


    Formation is the sudden cohesion of the group (the crowd) around a shared consensus. Desmet says he prefers the term mass formation — not mass formation psychosis — because he doesn’t want to use a diagnostic term and the word “psychosis” has a stigma and medical meaning attached to it. Either way, both terms have the same meaning, which involves the formation of a hypnotic state.


    Desmet’s upcoming book, “The Psychology of Totalitarianism,” explains that mass formation has grown over the last 200 years. On a grand scale, mass formation leads to totalitarian thinking and, eventually, to totalitarian states. He details the four conditions needed to achieve mass formation on a large scale, which include cognitive dissonance and psychological pain — factors that often leave people desperate for change and a way to escape:

    1. Feelings of social isolation and being alone among a large number of people

    2. Feelings that your life is pointless and meaningless

    3. High levels of free-floating anxiety

    4. High levels of free-floating frustration and aggression

    According to an abridged excerpt from Desmet’s book:

    “If under these conditions a narrative is distributed through the mass media which indicates an object of anxiety and provides a strategy to deal with this object of anxiety, then all the free floating anxiety might be associated to this object and a huge willingness might be observed to participate in the strategy to deal with the object of anxiety.
    At the same time, the field of attention gets narrower until it only contains the part of reality that is indicated by the narrative and people lose their capacity to take into account the other aspects of reality (what makes them often utterly irrational).”

    The More Absurd It Gets, the More Successful It Will Be

    People want to remove their feelings of social isolation and anxiety. Toward that end, mass formation involves obsessive focusing on a failure of the normal world or a particular event or person, who becomes the focus of the attention — and the more absurd the narrative becomes, the better. Desmet says in the video above:

    “The narrative that leads to the mass formation typically becomes more and more absurd, and the strange thing is that people don’t seem to notice this … The reason why people buy into the narrative is not, in the first place, because the narrative is correct or scientific or accurate.
    The reason why people buy into the narrative is because it creates this new social bond. That’s why typically during mass formation, the people who don’t want to conform to the masses, who don’t go along with the narrative, are typically [accused of] lacking citizenship and solidarity.”

    Desmet says that the more absurd the narrative and its surrounding measures become, the more successful they will be for a certain part of the population, usually about 30%, because the measures function as rituals, through which an individual shows that they are less important than the collective masses:14

    “A ritual is a kind of behavior that is without pragmatic meaning or sense, which is a symbolic kind of behavior through which an individual shows that it belongs to a collective and that it wants to sacrifice something of itself, which is important, in favor of the collective.”

    Another irony is that the higher the level of education, the more susceptible people usually are to mass formation, Desmet says. “The people who try to get advanced degrees are usually people who think that social status is very important. And that could be the reason they are inclined to conform with the mainstream narrative.”15 It may also explain why so many physicians and academics have bought into the propaganda, ignoring science in favor of the collective narrative.

    Fanaticism Allows for Lies, Manipulation

    Those who are under the spell of mass formation psychosis are so convinced that their narrative will save the world that they feel justified in using manipulative tactics and lies to protect it, Desmet explains, exemplifying Plato’s noble lie — the notion that, in the case of high-status individuals or designated public leaders, it’s acceptable to lie if the lie is made in the interest of the common good. According to Desmet:

    “Once you understand the nature of mass formation, you also understand what you can do about it. But that doesn’t mean that it is easy to do something about it. The process of mass formation is a kind of hypnosis. Most scholars agree that it is very hard to wake people up from such a state of mass formation. Mass formation is a phenomenon that’s provoked by a voice.
    It’s the voice of a leader, the voice that is distributed time and time again through the mass media, that keeps people in the grasp of mass formation, and the leader himself is also grasped in this process of mass formation … both the hypnotist and the hypnotized are into the process.”

    Who’s the leader today? “The experts. The authority and the technocrats you could say,” Desmet says. The way out involves having the courage to speak the truth, even though doing so is typically extremely dangerous.

    The ancient Greeks had a word for this — parrhesia, which is having the courage to speak the truth in spite of danger. But as Desmet explains, while those who try to reveal knowledge that is in conflict with the narrative put themselves at risk, if no one speaks the truth, society cannot continue to function.

    Four Steps to End Mass Formation Psychosis


    The first step to ending mass formation, which is also the most important, is speaking out against the official narrative if things seem off to you. “If you want to make the mass formation less deep, then it is quintessential that there are people who continue to speak out and [are a] dissonant voice in society, because this will disrupt the process of mass formation,” says Desmet.


    The second step involves connecting with other people in the real world who have a similar viewpoint as you or a feeling that something is wrong. Forming small networks in your community will help you break the mass formation cycle. It’s important, however that when you speak to people about the truth that you don’t try to take them back to the “old normal,” because, remember, this is what drove them to mass formation in the first place. According to Desmet:

    “If we try to convince people or bring a different narrative, [it’s important] that we do not try to convince people to go back to the old normal, because the old normal, that’s what people tried to escape through the process of mass formation. It was exactly because the old normal was unbearable that people were sensitive to the process of mass formation.
    What we should try to construct together is a new normal, which is not a technocratic or transhumanist new normal. We should show people that there are other options. There are other options to escape the old normal.”

    In short, Desmet recommends the following four steps to break free from mass formation psychosis and enact favorable change one social circle at a time:

    1. Continue to speak out

    2. Seek to connect with others of like mind

    3. Construct a narrative together of a new normal — not to be confused with the “new normal” the transhumanist, technocratic movements are trying to advance — showing people that there are other options to escape the old normal

    4. Always stick to the principles of nonviolent resistance

    The last step is an important one, because if you use aggression of any form, even in the way you speak, it will only be used as justification by the masses that they were right to oppose you. Nonviolent resistant is the most efficient strategy as you try to resist and defy the mass formation psychosis around you.


    How to Reverse Mass Formation Psychosis




    • Australian News
    • •
    • Politics
    • •
    • Health
    24 views0 comments
    1
    2345

    Back to Top

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter 

    Thanks for Subscribing!

    • YouTube
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    JulienAssange25.png

    SEE TV NETWORK

    By becoming a member of www.seetvnetwork.com you are helping free Julian Assange as 25% of your Membership will go directly to Save Julian Assange fund. Membership is only $4.95 Per Month with over 20000 hours of content from Movies, TV Series, Documentaries, Podcasts European Football and much more!

     

    All proceeds go directly to Julian Assange Fund please type in the code JulianAssange25

    • Home

    • About SeeTVNews

    • All News

    • Australian News

    • World News

    • Business

    • Sports News

    • Health

    • Videos

    • Crypto Currency

    • Precious Metals

    • Genral Information

    • Contact

    • Advertise

    • More

      Use tab to navigate through the menu items.

       Privacy Statement     Liability Statement     Terms of Service

      © 2021 by SeeTVNews. All rights reserved