ARE YOU PREPARED TO MAKE A DECISION?

10 Feb 2022 | SEETV NEWS | Please consider joining our Telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

Please subscribe and share

Read the following and listen to both videos for about three minutes each.

“Let’s be blunt; the so-called Digital Identity Bill represents a watershed moment in Australia’s history. We stand between a free personal enterprise future and a digital surveillance age.

If we do nothing to stop this Bill, the Government will sit in the middle of every interaction Australians have with each other and the world.

To achieve this in the same way China does by creating a digital identity that forms a central part of a person’s life. You can call it a “licence to live.” What began with a covert contact tracing, vaccine passports, QR Check-in, soon to be formalised – an inescapable digital identity.

It signals a complete end of consumer privacy, the end of citizenship and a Big Brother digital age that treats Australians as products rather than free human beings. The Government intends to build a complete digital record of every Australian to be shared and used.

Our medical history, shopping preferences, who we associate with, whether our choice is so-called green, social security, veterans services, travel records, website viewing, employment status, and social media comments. Everything will go on the record and be available to any large corporation that can pay for the access. This was orchestrated by a Federal Liberal National Government who previously but distortingly called it a Human-Centering Digital Identity”.

“The World Economic Forum is meant to be dismissed as a so-called conspiracy theory. Why is the Federal Liberal Party copying its policies directly from the World Economic Forum’s global digital identity project, if that’s the case?

It’s designed to shift the economy from private ownership into what the World Economic Forum calls an access model. You will own nothing and rent goods and services from the world’s billionaires and billionaire corporations. In other words, the role of the digital identity bill is life via subscription.

Without assets and ownership, Australians will have no power over the Government nor any power over the corporations. They want to control people’s lives. In their eyes, this will help the world live sustainably, but in reality, it is a form of slavery to a closed-loop economy where you have less, and the rich have more, way more.

The Liberals have already spent a Billion dollars of our taxpayer dollars on their digital economy strategy for 2030.

All they need to make the Global Socialist’s dream a reality is to pass the so-called trusted Digital Identity Bill”.

Also, watch another three-minute video.

Ongoing Studies with mRNA Injections on Thousands of Babies and Children....

7 Feb 2022 Please join our Telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

Please subscribe and share

Every good mum and dad only wants the best for the child - organic carrot juice, an organic banana every day, only soft, genuine cotton blankets with an eco-label, toys without evaporating toxins so that the child can thrive. The panic media is now working flat out to ensure that the good mums and dads - because they only want the best for their children - allow one or two, maybe even three injections with genetically modified mRNA substances into the children as quickly as possible injected. Where are the questions: "Is this also organic?", or "Does the syringe content come from ecological cultivation?". Panic-stricken, anxious that the offspring will not be ostracized at school or suffer "social disadvantages", one forgets to ask all these which seems to be quite important when buying a toy. "

The mRNA injections have so-called "conditional approvals", which means that they are neither fully developed nor is the effect profile known in the various population groups, not even in the "smallest". Even worse: You are still looking for the "right dose" in the composition, and you still have a lot of questions that are only to be answered by ongoing studies.

According to clinicaltrials.gov worldwide, there are currently 115 studies in children from the age of 6 months (!) in connection with Covid-19 and the experimental mRNA injections. This involves different questions, because you are in experimental phase 1, 2 or 3. Phase 1 means you have no idea how the substance could work - and that's the case with many questions!

A study on children aged 5-11 that is being carried out at the Rabin Medical Center in Israel should be mentioned here as an example. When you think of Israel, you think of the descendants of the Holocaust. Yes, that's where children's studies are done! In six months - from December 30, 2021 to June 30, 2022 - they want to find out whether the children are producing antibodies - because, until now, we don't know! Could be - but also might not be.... The official study title is: "REAL SARS-CoV-2 ANTIBODY RESPONSE IN CHILDREN AGED 5-11 YEARS AFTER BNT162b2 mRNA VACCINATION: A PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY" on 150 participants. Rabin Medical Center advertises itself as the largest heart center in Israel, and among others the national center for difficult pregnancy and childbirth, as well as a specialist in genetic tests and genetic investigations. Here they are planning to carry out Covid-19 mRNA injection studies in children, because - according to the introductory text to the study it says:

"There is little data on the immunogenicity of Pfizer-Biontec's BNT162b2 vaccine for the prevention of COVID-19 disease and on side effects in children aged 5-11 years. Therefore, our goal is to determine the immunogenicity and the Describe local or systemic reactogenicity events following vaccination with the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in children aged 5-11 years for a period of six and a half months after the first dose of the vaccine."

Just to reiterate, read it be overlooked: There is little data on immunogenicity....in children....!!!

You can get more details yourself at:

Consult https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05175989?term=COVID-19+vaccine&cond=Vaccine+covid-19&age=0&draw=2 .

None of the panic prophets on the propaganda frontline told you that, nor did the headmaster who has the vaccination bus pull up in the schoolyard. In this way, children who cannot withstand the peer pressure of the class are forced to consent to an experimental gene injection in order to continue to "belong". Because they cannot possibly recognize and assess the consequences of the mRNA injection! Is it "wise" to use such tactics today - and later a crime against all children?

Another study by Biontech/Pfizer on a "cohort", as study participants are called, of 11,422 children aged 6 months(!) to 18 years is currently in the "recruitment phase":

"PHASE 1, OPEN-LABEL DOSE-FINDING STUDY TO ASSESS THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY AND PHASE 2/3 PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, OBSERVER-BLIND SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY STUDY OF A SARS-COV-2 RNA VACCINE CANDIDATE AGAINST COVID- 19 IN HEALTHY CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS"

Duration of study from March 2021 to May 2026. So in 5 years they might have figured out which dose is the right one?

In the short summary you can read:

"This is a Phase 1/2/3 study in healthy children and young adults. Depending on the safety and/or immunogenicity data generated over the course of this study and the resulting risk/benefit assessment, the safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 in participants less than 6 months of age will subsequently be assessed."

More details at:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643?cond=Vaccine+covid-19&age=0&draw=3

Graphic illustrating the procedure for the dose-finding study:

Dose-finding study in children and young adults aged 6 months to 18 years

One has to ask oneself how one can really understand this "study objective"? 11,422 children between the ages of 6 months and 18 years are injected with a gene experiment substance in different doses in order to then be able to estimate how these substances can subsequently be evaluated in babies aged 0-6 months...?! You just rub your eyes when you read that.... is that utter nonsense? mockery? Do parents really want to give up their children for this? Is it even more perfidious? Which "Dr. Experts" came up with this? How much research funding is there for such ethically-morally abysmal, deeply reprehensible "studies" with very questionable goals? Those would be interesting questions that will probably never be answered.

The trials for this study will be conducted at 94 medical facilities in the US, Finland, Poland and Spain, including children's hospitals. Fourteen "primary objectives" have been defined, including finding out how many babies and children will have "local", "systemic", "adverse events" and "serious adverse events" at what dose. This includes ranging reactions from pain in the arm, fever, nausea, diarrhea, dizziness, muscle and joint pain to "serious reactions" that have not been further specified. It is now known that young people like to suffer from heart muscle inflammation after vaccination, but can also die "suddenly and unexpectedly", like a 5-year-old girl, 4 days after the Pfizer injection: https://medalerts.org /vaersdb/findfield.

One of the "secondary goals" is to find out whether SARS-CoV-2 serum level-neutralizing antibodies, expressed as GMTs, are formed. Results will have to wait until 2026. It may be that the gene experiment material produces the desired results - or not. Until then, the "DrExperts" have their sheep in the dry.

In the meantime, the propaganda machine will make so much noise that such background studies will not reach the minds of the people who lend their children to the experimenters. You probably never hear about it in the news.

Only two studies were selected as examples - there are 113 other studies, spread over many institutions, university hospitals, children's hospitals, obstetric facilities, medical centers, etc. in all over the world on children, young adults, which can be found at clinical trial .gov.

Why don't you ask the doctors exactly what they inject into the children? Ask about liability if your child develops health problems after the vaccination. Ask about blood tests, inflammation levels, oxygen saturation - before the vaccination - after the vaccination, ask how you may have to document and prove vaccination damage.... oblige the doctor to examine your child regularly after the vaccination, the To document the health of the child and possibly pay for extra costs should your child endure health consequences, keep asking... because you want the best for your child! Find out for yourself - and don't leave it to your flat screen TV and the propaganda orchestra - which always sings the same song, educate you about risks and effects. No, there are no "side effects" when children suffer health damage or even die!

Being aware of all aspects of this is your highly personal task! None of those who are beating the propaganda drum so loudly today will bring your healthy child back to you. The mRNA injections are part of an ongoing live experiment with billions of "laboratory people" (instead of rats) - not only on children, but also on adults - worldwide! who are beating the propaganda drum so loudly today. The mRNA injections are part of an ongoing live experiment with billions of "laboratory people" (instead of rats) - not only on children, but also on adults - worldwide! who are beating the propaganda drum so loudly today. The mRNA injections are part of an ongoing live experiment with billions of "laboratory people" (instead of rats) - not only on children, but also on adults - worldwide!

At least you should know what you are doing!

Jacinda Ardern flees public ‘bail-in’ debate (Scott Morrison just lies)

31 January 2022 | Source: Australian Citizens Party | Please share and subscribe - Join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

NZ’s Ardern government has dropped a planned bail-in law, to avoid a backlash from an angry public who won’t want their deposits stolen; Kiwis and Aussies should demand their governments jettison all bail-in powers.

New Zealand’s Ardern government has confirmed a political truth: no government can enact “bail-in” laws, which give authorities the power to confiscate bank customers’ savings deposits to prop up failing banks in a financial crisis, in full public view. In April 2021 the NZ Cabinet announced it would enact so-called “statutory” bail-in, meaning legislation that lays out exactly how a bail-in would work, in accordance with International Monetary Fund (IMF) requirements. The statutory bail-in powers were to be included in NZ’s landmark Deposit Takers Act, in consultation phase until 21 February, which would overhaul regulation for deposit-taking financial institutions, and include a deposit insurance scheme for the first time, guaranteeing NZ$100,000 per account. However, in October, the Cabinet quietly dropped the statutory bail-in provisions, fearing its legislative reform may fail to pass if it had to engage in a public debate about why citizens should be happy to lose their savings to save banks.

NZ already has bail-in powers, but these are directions powers of the Reserve Bank of New Zealand (RBNZ), called Open Bank Resolution (OBR). RBNZ is remarkably transparent about how OBR will be used to freeze and confiscate deposits—in fact, OBR is the most transparent bail-in scheme in the world, with a large colour graphic on RBNZ’s website explaining how it would work—but in a way that only finance geeks would be aware of. When RBNZ devised its bail-in powers in the mid-2000s, nobody in NZ’s general public noticed.

Bail-in is a global banking regulation policy developed by the Financial Stability Board (FSB) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) in Switzerland after the 2008 global financial crisis. Instead of demanding the banks end the reckless gambling in toxic derivatives that caused the GFC, by reintroducing Glass-Steagall powers to separate banks with deposits from speculative investment banking, the ex-investment bankers at the FSB decided to put unsuspecting bank depositors on the hook for bank losses. The FSB directed all nations to comply with its bail-in policy, called Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes.

RBNZ’s OBR was actually ahead of the curve, so RBNZ replied to the FSB that its existing powers already complied (later the IMF said all countries should enact statutory bail-in powers). Other countries enacted bail-in powers, including the USA, UK and EU, and Canada, but they all had one thing in common: nobody knew about it—there was no public debate! Only two countries had public debates about bail-in before legislation was enacted, India and Australia, and both in 2017. When India announced bail-in legislation in 2017, the public backlash was so severe the government quickly dropped it. In Australia, the Citizens Party had led a massive campaign to expose and oppose bail-in since 2013, when the bail-in of bank deposits in Cyprus banks had first revealed the policy to the world, so in 2017 then-Treasurer Scott Morrison had to sneak it through.

Late on a Friday afternoon in August 2017, so nobody would notice, Morrison’s Treasury released an exposure draft of a vaguely-titled bill, the Financial Sector Legislation Amendment (Crisis Resolution Powers and Other Measures) Bill 2017. The Citizens Party noticed, however, and detected in the bill a broadly-worded provision creating a loophole that could be used to bail in deposits in a crisis. The Citizens Party’s intense mobilisation against the bill, which coincided with the uproar over the banks that forced Malcolm Turnbull to call the banking royal commission, led to an inquiry chaired by “Senator for bankers” Jane Hume, which denied the law could be used to bail in deposits. But when One Nation Senators informed the Leader of the Government in the Senate, Mathias Cormann, on the eve of the Senate debate on the bill, that they intended to move an amendment to close the loophole, the government pulled a dirty trick. Cormann offered to have Treasury lawyers proof-read One Nation’s amendment, and the next day, while the One Nation Senators were waiting to hear back from Treasury, the government and Labor Party snuck the bill through the Senate with only eight Senators present in the chamber and with only a vote “on the voices”, not a formal division that would require all Senators to be present to vote.

Ever since that fateful day of 14 February 2018—the St. Valentine’s Day massacre of Australians’ savings—the government has continued to deny its law could be used to steal deposits. Moreover, in a 2020 Senate inquiry on a bill by One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts to amend the 2018 law to again close the loophole to exclude deposits, the government doubled down on its denial, by claiming that bailing in deposits would be unthinkable, because it would badly destabilise the banking system. Yet the Australian government has never commented on the fact that many other jurisdictions do have deposit bail-in powers, including NZ—the nation closest to Australia with the most similar financial system, as NZ’s major banks are owned by Australia’s Big Four banks. It hasn’t commented on these other jurisdictions, because its denials aren’t genuine; it’s desperately trying to suppress a public backlash.

Now that the NZ government has fled a public bail-in debate, Aussies and Kiwis need to realise their political power, and demand their governments drop all bail-in powers completely. Kiwis should start a campaign to force Ardern to make RBNZ abandon Open Bank Resolution; Aussies should demand the government pass Senator Roberts’ amendment to close up the deposit loophole in the 2018 law. (Treasurer Josh Frydenberg promised to negotiate a resolution with Roberts, but has dragged his feet.)

With inflation rearing its ugly head, putting upward pressure on interest rates that would smash borrowers and put the banks that are over-exposed to the housing bubble at risk of failing, it is urgent that bail-in be dropped—now!