Medical Vaccine Exemptions

19 Jan 2022 | Written by: Sibby | Please share and subscribe

Join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

I have recently been offered another contract that involved me being drawn on from a pool of subject matter experts to deliver face-to-face training in a specialty field as needed across NSW.

This is yet another employer which has been forced to mandate vaccines to its workers by a certain date. Obviously, I cannot comply, and as a result an option was offered to me, that if I provided an exemption, my services would be engaged regardless.

The interesting thing about the exemption is, it has to be completed by the doctor on the stipulated NSW government documentation, and also has to be signed off by the Chief Health Officer of NSW. This puts an interesting spin on this of course, as there would be very few doctors, who would be prepared to complete these exemptions, knowing that this would then have to be signed off by the CHO and they would consequently be registered as a doctor that issued such an exemption. That’s what I call ‘sticking your neck out’!

I have previously lost 4 other critical contracts due to the very same mandates, and it is now getting to the stage where I cannot afford to lose another contract. Obviously, we need to all pay bills, and eventually when bills are not paid, there are dire consequences.

I was also aware from previous conversations with my doctor, that he had ‘considerable pressure from TGA’ (Therapeutic Goods Administration) and there was a very narrow window of circumstances under which they could issue such exemptions.

I decided to once more send an email, and in detail explain my predicament, also highlighting the fact that I had recently had some adverse and anaphylactic reactions to paralyses ticks. Further, I explained, that I needed to be able to fulfil this contract in order to make ends meet.

I was in no doubt what the response would be, however felt I needed to explore this option one more time, only to receive the following email from my doctor:

Dear Sibby,

I can understand your concerns but the only way to get an exemption is to see an allergy specialist who will then be able to document the allergies. You may find it useful to see the specialist who looked after you following the tick anaphylaxis.

I am afraid I cannot write up exemptions because of the restraints the government has put on this. But an allergy specialist might be able to do so.

Hope this helps,

So here we are; get the vaccine and risk adverse side effects or even death, or don’t get work and eventually starve. Those are your choices.

I decided to respond and remind them, that not only had there been a recent case lodged in the International Criminal Court in The Hague with regards to the toxicity and side effects of the vaccines, and a criminal investigation had commenced in the UK with regards to the very same vaccines, but I reminded them also of the medical oath that he and his colleagues would have taken when they had been admitted into the medical profession.

At the time of being admitted as a member of the medical profession:

I solemnly pledge to consecrate my life to the service of humanity;

I will give to my teachers the respect and gratitude that is their due;

I will practise my profession with conscience and dignity;

The health of my patient will be my first consideration;

I will respect the secrets that are confided in me, even after the patient has died;

I will maintain, by all the means in my power, the honour and the noble traditions of the medical profession;

My colleagues will be my sisters and brothers;

I will not permit considerations of age, disease or disability, creed, ethnic origin, gender, nationality, political affiliation, race, sexual orientation, social standing or any other factor to intervene between my duty and my patient;

I will maintain the utmost respect for human life;

I will not use my medical knowledge to violate human rights and civil liberties, even under threat;

I make these promises solemnly, freely and upon my honour.

I believe it is time to remind the medical profession of this oath, and the government, that we will not be dictated to about a substance that puts our health at risk!

Hold the line!

The question is when did doctors prostitute themselves to the Government and Big Pharma?

The Dominos are Falling

January 18 2022 | Frank Ziovas | Please share and subscribe join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

For the last 4 weeks I have been saying to people, that the ‘energies’ are at tipping point, and I can feel something is about to happen that will change the current state of the world and where we are headed. This feeling has become more intense in the last 2 weeks, and no matter what I did, I could not shake it.

The movement of knowledge and people’s awareness has changed exponentially over the last 4 weeks. We are seeing protests all over the world, and people are starting to wake up to the fact, that they have complied with government mandates, been locked up for extended periods of time, had their 2 vaccines and possible boosters, but are still now having to wear masks, face restrictions and, according to the latest ‘science’, are still catching and transmitting the virus - whichever variant is the latest flavour put out by the ‘fear media’.

Those of us in the know of course have always been hyper-aware that this has never been about health or protecting us, this has always been about control, the great reset and wealth redistribution. We have known, that behind the health pandemic a crime beyond comprehension was being hidden. A crime so ambitious in fact, that most people dare not think it possible, hiding their head in the sand, and going along with the government agendas simply because that is the easiest option. And here we have it; the verdict of the International Common Law Court of Justice, naming 75 individuals complicit of these crimes, associated arrest warrants and warrants for seizure and expropriation, which will see the individuals not only rotting in jail for the terms of their natural lives, but also stripped of their assets and their corporations dismantled. Among those noteworthy, are the CEOs of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals and Glaxo Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals, the Pope and Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England. Yes, indeed, you read correctly!

The legal action was brought on by the Canadian citizens and the 18-page verdict details the extent of the crimes, which are beyond comprehension. You should be warned, as even I, who has been exposed to many gruesome details and documents over the last 24 months, was affected emotionally when reading it. It is not for the light-hearted.

Whilst this is not the usual court pathway, it is in essence a common law ‘people’s court’ for one of a better word, established and conducted in an ethical manner, with an appointed judge and rules of evidence applied to the evidence presented. It has in fact been a detailed and thorough process that has taken close to 5 months to bring to closure.

This court process has also managed to achieve the removal of Pope Benedict in 2013 and others associated, so perhaps this particular process should not be underestimated. This verdict could be viewed as a bit of a ‘toothless tiger’ and as with anything, how do you achieve court compliance with a verdict, when there is the possibility that police and other authorities may not be operating on the same side of the law. Let’s face it, even Scott Morrison has not complied with conventional court and AAT directives with regards to producing evidence. So, what hope do we really have?

It should however build confidence with people, that the justice system is working for the people and is starting to move, uncovering the truth and the extent of the crimes are starting to coming to light. The verdict will be particularly hard hitting for the people who were coerced to take the vaccines or who chose to take the vaccines, led to believe by governments that this was for their health and others, as the extent of these poisons dawns on their consciousness. The “vaccines” have been called ‘weapons of mass genocide’ in the court verdict and were produced purely to control population numbers and growth, causing deaths, long term illnesses and side effects, still births and infertility to name a few. The fallout of which will be seen for years to come. The court verdict and details contained within, will take a while for the vaccinated and ‘Covidians’ to digest.

Of course, there are other court actions pending and ready to be lodged by various parties, which we will share with you in further posts. But at this stage, it appears the dominos are starting to fall as more and more information surfaces.

Download the verdict below

Verdict-and-Sentence-of-the-International-Common-Law-Court-of-Justice

.pdf

Download PDF • 644KB

The Vaccination Game - Prof Kristine Macartney

30 October 2021 | Michael Moore | michael.moore@seetvnews.com

Please subscribe & share; Follow us on Telegram https://t.me/seetvnews

Why are the State Governments so keen to get people vaccinated? What is actually behind this extraordinary push for vaccination? Why is Daniel Andrews so determined to take supreme control over Victoria to the point where a Stasi like control is required?

For a viral infection that is little worse than Influenza or other Sars infections, this desperation to get as many vaccinated as possible carries the mark of desperation.

Let us look at what is happening behind the scenes.

The court filings in the NSW Supreme Court case on mandatory vaccinations reveal that the lead vaccine researchers are currently driving all government policy in Australia and received $65,330,038 in government grants covering 2020-2023. Grants of this size have NEVER been issued before.

You might recall when Clive Palmer mentioned, in a press conference two weeks ago, that Gladys Berejiklian was being paid tens of millions of dollars by a lobbyist in Sydney? That lobbyist was likely Macartney, The same likely applies to Daniel Andrews which would explain the determination to enforce vaccination on everyone. In other words they have sold out. Notice below, that the name “K Macartney” appears next to every single one of the grants. This is referring to Professor Kristine Macartney who is a paediatrician specialising in infectious diseases and vaccinology. She is also a director of the National Centre for Immunisation Research & Surveillance (NCIRS). Most revealingly, she is also a member of the Advisory Committee on vaccines (ACV) of the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA). Yep, the same TGA that BANNED Ivermectin as an early treatment option for treating OVID despite its high efficacy in treating OVID in other countries. Prof Kristine Macartney has also acted as an expert consultant to the World Health Organisation (WHO). She was also one of the contributing authors of a peer-reviewed paper entitled “Constructing an ethical framework for priority allocation of pandemic vaccines” Now you know why Ivermectin was banned. This all indicates why Prof Kristine Macartney seemed very uncomfortable when she was questioned during the NSW Supreme Court hearings. Another point of interest is that many of the grants were applied for and awarded before 2020. And it is not over. A lot of the grants are covered until well into 2023. So whenever a state gets near to zero and the end of the state of emergency is in sight, a mystery case pops up and an outbreak occurs. And this is why Andrews wants to enact a law giving hiom powers to declare a permanent state of emergency. Now you understand what’s driving lockdown policy and vaccine ‘mandates’ in Australia.

Follow the money.

References:

https://lnkd.in/g-DF_jAM

https://www.seetvnews.com/post/sutton-and-halton-the-vaccination-game

https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/courts-law/gladys-berejiklians-today-show-comment-raised-in-mandatory-vaccine-lawsuit/news-story/1160d7d6808af6466a6ddb5676916347?utm_source=SEM&utm_medium=PPC_SEM&utm_campaign={campaign}

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/expert-asked-about-vitamin-c-zinc-during-court-challenge-to-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-20210930-p58w09.html

https://www.supremecourt.justice.nsw.gov.au/Pages/sco2_transcripts/sco2_transcripts.aspx