The Dominos are Falling

January 18 2022 | Frank Ziovas | Please share and subscribe join our telegram channel https://t.me/seetvnews

For the last 4 weeks I have been saying to people, that the ‘energies’ are at tipping point, and I can feel something is about to happen that will change the current state of the world and where we are headed. This feeling has become more intense in the last 2 weeks, and no matter what I did, I could not shake it.

The movement of knowledge and people’s awareness has changed exponentially over the last 4 weeks. We are seeing protests all over the world, and people are starting to wake up to the fact, that they have complied with government mandates, been locked up for extended periods of time, had their 2 vaccines and possible boosters, but are still now having to wear masks, face restrictions and, according to the latest ‘science’, are still catching and transmitting the virus - whichever variant is the latest flavour put out by the ‘fear media’.

Those of us in the know of course have always been hyper-aware that this has never been about health or protecting us, this has always been about control, the great reset and wealth redistribution. We have known, that behind the health pandemic a crime beyond comprehension was being hidden. A crime so ambitious in fact, that most people dare not think it possible, hiding their head in the sand, and going along with the government agendas simply because that is the easiest option. And here we have it; the verdict of the International Common Law Court of Justice, naming 75 individuals complicit of these crimes, associated arrest warrants and warrants for seizure and expropriation, which will see the individuals not only rotting in jail for the terms of their natural lives, but also stripped of their assets and their corporations dismantled. Among those noteworthy, are the CEOs of Pfizer Pharmaceuticals and Glaxo Smith Kline Pharmaceuticals, the Pope and Elizabeth Windsor, Queen of England. Yes, indeed, you read correctly!

The legal action was brought on by the Canadian citizens and the 18-page verdict details the extent of the crimes, which are beyond comprehension. You should be warned, as even I, who has been exposed to many gruesome details and documents over the last 24 months, was affected emotionally when reading it. It is not for the light-hearted.

Whilst this is not the usual court pathway, it is in essence a common law ‘people’s court’ for one of a better word, established and conducted in an ethical manner, with an appointed judge and rules of evidence applied to the evidence presented. It has in fact been a detailed and thorough process that has taken close to 5 months to bring to closure.

This court process has also managed to achieve the removal of Pope Benedict in 2013 and others associated, so perhaps this particular process should not be underestimated. This verdict could be viewed as a bit of a ‘toothless tiger’ and as with anything, how do you achieve court compliance with a verdict, when there is the possibility that police and other authorities may not be operating on the same side of the law. Let’s face it, even Scott Morrison has not complied with conventional court and AAT directives with regards to producing evidence. So, what hope do we really have?

It should however build confidence with people, that the justice system is working for the people and is starting to move, uncovering the truth and the extent of the crimes are starting to coming to light. The verdict will be particularly hard hitting for the people who were coerced to take the vaccines or who chose to take the vaccines, led to believe by governments that this was for their health and others, as the extent of these poisons dawns on their consciousness. The “vaccines” have been called ‘weapons of mass genocide’ in the court verdict and were produced purely to control population numbers and growth, causing deaths, long term illnesses and side effects, still births and infertility to name a few. The fallout of which will be seen for years to come. The court verdict and details contained within, will take a while for the vaccinated and ‘Covidians’ to digest.

Of course, there are other court actions pending and ready to be lodged by various parties, which we will share with you in further posts. But at this stage, it appears the dominos are starting to fall as more and more information surfaces.

Download the verdict below

Verdict-and-Sentence-of-the-International-Common-Law-Court-of-Justice

.pdf

Download PDF • 644KB

Questions About Vaccinated People Donating Blood and Organs

An individual who has received a mRNA vaccine will have an established change to their DNA (after all that is the purpose of the mRNA structure (See https://www.seetvnews.com/post/what-is-a-rna-vaccine ). This includes the blood and organs of the body. All will have a change as a result of the vaccine and the DNA structure will have changed for the entire physical system.

This begs several questions.

If the vaccine recipient donates blood, will that blood contain the mRNA structure or at least the altered DNA structure?

In the past a history of people being infected with a virus such as Hepatitis and HIV have been known through blood transfusion from infected blood so it is eminently possible that any change in the blood will be passed on to the recipient.

The blood will contain the altered DNA of course so this is likely to have an unknown effect on the recipient. When giving blood transfusions the type of blood to give the patient is important as there are several types of blood (There are eight main blood types: A positive, A negative, B positive, B negative, AB positive, AB negative, O positive and O negative. The positive and negative refers to your Rh type (once called Rhesus). Google – Blood types) and giving the wrong type can cause issues. If the DNA of the blood is changed and different to the recipients, will that type of DNA, cause further problems?

This question was asked by an Irish Inquiry from one of their viewers in an interview recently with a Dr. Dolores Cahill & Ivor Cummins and the response was ‘don’t take blood by someone who has been vaccinated.’

The same goes for donated organs. If the vaccinated individual donates a kidney, say, to an unvaccinated individual will that kidney pass on the altered DNA structure to the new kidney recipient? Or will it simply create further compatibility issues for the recipient? If so how does one address that? With donated organs, the blood type of the donor must be compatible with the recipient. (Blood type O is considered the universal donor. People with blood type O can give to any other blood type. Blood type AB is called the universal recipient because they can receive an organ or blood from people with any blood type).Usually with donated organs incompatibility is addressed with finding the closes match with HLA Typing. HLA typing is also called “tissue typing”. HLA stands for human leukocyte antigen. Antigens are proteins on the cells in the body. Over 100 different antigens have been identified, but there are six which are the most important when it comes to organ transplants. Of these six antigens, we inherit three from each parent.

Except in cases of identical twins and some siblings, it is rare to get a six-antigen match between two people, especially if they are unrelated. Kidneys are very successfully transplanted between two people with no matching antigens. A person can make antibodies against another person’s HLA antigens. Antibodies can result from blood transfusions, pregnancy, infections or even a viral illness. Having one of these events does not mean a person will make antibodies but they could. If a recipient has strong antibodies against a donor’s HLA, the risk of rejection is high and a donor would be declined for that recipient. But when it comes to organs that have had their DNA altered by virtual of a vaccine it is unlikely that the DNA will affect the rest of the body. It is the HIA antibodies that are important and are those which are sometimes addressed with drugs or medications to ensure acceptance of the donated organ by he body.

So the likelihood of receiving an altered DNA from an organ transplant is minimal.

Conclusion: It would be prudent then before receiving a blood transfusion or organ transplant to ask if the blood was originated from someone vaccinated with a mRNA vaccine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saIqmsf73xE&t=2282s

https://health.ucdavis.edu/transplant/livingkidneydonation/matching-and-compatibility.html

Communism by any Other Word is Still … Communism.

Michael Moore 03 March 2021 michael.moore@seetvnews.com

Please subscribe and share and help us spread the truth!

This is not communism and we are not living in a communistic society.

“The collective is being gas-lighted and prepared for communism. disguised as "sustainable" living. All of this virtue-signalling and unscientific, altruistic BS is intended specifically to condition humanity to willingly forfeit individual rights.” Joanna van Bijsterveld

“I will not inject my body for the sake of the collective.

I will not block my breathing for the sake of the collective.

I will not fundamentally alter my lifestyle to accommodate the irrational fears of the collective.

This is a philosophical battle between the individual and the collective.

Those who are scared can choose of their own volition to inject their body, block their breathing, stay inside, and avoid whatever they perceive to be dangerous, but they may not demand or mandate these things for another.?

• The collective is not owed safety or protection at the expense of the individual.

• The healthy are not obligated to sacrifice themselves to the sick.

• The confident are not obligated to sacrifice themselves to the fearful.

• The idea that the individual owes anything to the collective is a delusion.

• The collective would not exist without the individual.

The freedom and choice of the individual must always supersede the preferences of the mob, when this principle is inverted societal destruction is inevitable.

Many people have been conditioned to believe this is an “unloving” or “selfish” perspective, while completely overlooking how unloving and selfish it is to demand an individual sacrifice their own well-being for the sake of the herd.

Upholding the right for an individual to choose for themselves is the most loving and honorable thing a society can do”

— Dr. Melissa Sell

Communism destroys itself from within. It subjugates its community and places the entire decision making in the hands of a select few. This results in less ability to think and subsequently less capability of the community through the reduced practice of responsibility and ability to be cause. The society becomes spectators, not doers and so the society collapses through lack of action. You cannot build a nation by watching TV.

Please share