Freedom is Slavery

Michael Moore: 20 November 2020

Subscribe and share and support us in our fight for freedom

In George Orwell’s book, 1984 the motto ‘Freedom is Slavery.’ Is quoted. But what does that mean? Does it mean that to be free you must be a slave? Or does it mean that to be a slave, you must be free?

In effect what it means is that being a slave is freedom. As a slave you:

1. Do not have to think for yourself. Your thinking is done for you. This is expressed in the media where one is told what to think and accept without question.

2. Everything you need (as distinct to want) is provided for you. You become dependent on the government for your income. Taking away one’s independence makes one a slave by giving the apparency of freedom. A lack of or reduction in responsibility is not freedom although it is portrayed as such. A basic income is provided (which is just slightly above the minimum for sustenance) and one is educated that wanting more is bad and one is restricted in what one has.

3. You are told where to go, what you can do what you cannot do and where you cannot go. Your movements are monitored and controlled, ostensibly due perhaps to a health issue.

4. Your rights are restricted to what someone else says they are. If the controlling factor says you do not have the right to a particular freedom, then that is the limit that has been imposed upon you. Life consists of barriers, freedoms and purposes. Control the freedoms barriers and indeed even the purposes and you control life.

In the final analysis it is the freedom of no responsibility. No responsibility means no control. It means you are not the master of your own fate. Your life is in the hands of another or others. This is based on the warped notion that responsibility IS slavery. That to be responsible is to be a slave. A very warped and distorted view of life indeed. And you do not have to be in agreement with it.

Eleanor Roosevelt once said that everyone is responsible for their own lives. And this is true. It is also the way to freedom. Being responsible for one’s own live puts one in the driver’s seat. It enables one to take charge and decide on ones purpose in life is going to be. Taking responsibility for oneself is the first step to self-control.

Freedom is not slavery. Freedom is YOU taking charge of your life. Not another person, or a government or any of those who ‘think’ they are in charge of your or another’s live.

YOU are the writer, producer and director of your own life. Remember that.

What Is In a Vaccine?

Michael Moore 18 November 2020

Support us by sharing and subscribing

Few know what is contained within a vaccine and they might be surprised and even a little disturbed to find out what some of the ingredients are.

It is always a good idea to ask your medical practitioner or health advisor what the ingredients are in the vaccine he or she is encouraging you to take so here is a typical breakdown of the ingredients you may find in a vaccine.

MMR (MMR-II) 2/2020 (Vaccine for Measles or Rubella) for example may contain:

• Vitamins.

• amino acids. Amino acids are organic compounds that contain amine (–NH2) and carboxyl (–COOH) functional groups, along with a side chain (R group) specific to each .

• fetal bovine serum. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) comes from the blood drawn from a bovine fetus via a closed system of collection at the slaughterhouse. Fetal bovine serum is the most widely used serum-supplement for the in vitro cell culture of eukaryotic cells. In other words blood from an unborn or recently born calf.

• Sucrose, Sugar

• Glutamate. A thickener

• Recombinant human Albumin (Human) 5% is a sterile, liquid preparation of albumin derived from large pools of human plasma or blood.

• Neomycin, an antibiotic

• Sorbitol, less commonly known as glucitol is a sugar alcohol

• hydrolyzed gelatin, Hydrolyzed gelatin is the result of gelatin in hydrolysis. The act of hydrolyzing something means to break it down by using water. It should be noted that most gelatine comes from the bones of animals.

• Sodium phosphate, a type of salt

• Sodium. Salt

Other vaccines contain similar ingredients. A few will contain Mercury (not so common these days) in the form of Thimerosal which is a form of mercury ‘considered’ safe due to the small amount used.

Also Formaldehyde (Formaldehyde is a colorless, strong-smelling gas used in making building materials and many household products. It is used in pressed-wood products, such as particleboard, plywood, and fiberboard; glues and adhesives; permanent-press fabrics; paper product coatings; and certain insulation materials. Ingestion of formaldehyde can be fatal, and long-term exposure to low levels in the air or on the skin can cause asthma-like respiratory problems and skin irritation such as dermatitis and itching. Concentrations of 100 ppm are immediately dangerous to life and health (IDLH)) is used in some vaccines (especially Polio vaccines)

Apart from the chemicals used, with the contents including ingredients from animals and humans, this would be of concern to:

1. Some religions and there adherences, such as Hindus, Sikhs’ Jehovah’s witness to name but a few.

2. Vegetarians and Vegans.

3. Anyone who objects to having injected into their body the blood of animals and humans.

They may exercise the right to refuse on religious or health grounds.

In addition, the apparent urgency of rapid development and production of a vaccine for the COVID‑19 pandemic is likely to increase the risks and failure rate of delivering a safe, effective vaccine. One study found that between 2006 and 2015, the success rate of obtaining approval from Phase I to successful Phase III trials was 16.2% for vaccines, and CEPI indicates a potential success rate of only 10% for vaccine candidates in 2020 development. Seems to be a very poor result for a blanket medication of an entire population.

NOW, the ingredients for a COVID-19 Vaccination have emerged as listed on the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine and include:

ChAd0x1-s Recombinant. Recombinant DNA molecules are DNA molecules formed by laboratory methods of genetic recombination to bring together genetic material from multiple sources, creating sequences that would not otherwise be found in the genome.

Another ingredient listed by AstraZeneca is MRC-5. For the uninitiated MRC-5 (Medical Research Council cell strain 5) is a diploid human cell culture line composed of fibroblasts, originally developed from research deriving lung tissue of a 14-week-old aborted Caucasian male fetus.

“The Italian vaccine research and advocacy organization Corvelva recently released new data regarding the use of aborted fetal cell lines in vaccines.

The research reports the results produced from the MRC 5 cell line analysis, particularly the one contained in GlaxoSmithKline’s tetravalent measles-mumps-rubella-chickenpox (MMRV) vaccine.

1. The Corvelva team summarized their findings as follows:

2. The fetal cell line was found to belong to a male fetus.

3. The cell line presents itself in such a way that it is likely to be very old, thus consistent with the declared line of the 1960s.

4. The fetal human DNA represented in this vaccine is a complete individual genome, that is, the genomic DNA of all the chromosomes of an individual is present in the vaccine.

5. The human genomic DNA contained in this vaccine is clearly, undoubtedly abnormal, presenting important inconsistencies with a typical human genome, that is, with that of a healthy individual.

6. 560 genes known to be associated with forms of cancer were tested and all underwent major modifications.

7. There are variations whose consequences are not even known, not yet appearing in the literature, but which still affect genes involved in the induction of human cancer.

What is also clearly abnormal is the genome excess showing changes in the number of copies and structural variants.…the DNA contained in these vaccines is potentially TUMORIGENIC… Corvelva notes that, according to the guidelines (which are found in the report), the presence of fetal DNA from cell lines MRC-5 and WI-38, as diploids, does not provide for upper limits: there is no limit to the amount they can find inside a vaccine. The motivation lies in the fact that these lines are not considered tumors because they have a “finite” (not immortalized) replicative cycle.” Naturtalnana website. MRC-5: What is that?

Something that would be of concern to certain philosophies and religions as well as vegetarians and vegans and contains many ethics issues of concern.

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fetal_bovine_serum#:~:text=Fetal%20bovine%20serum%20(FBS)%20comes,cell%20culture%20of%20eukaryotic%20cells.

https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/10/what-is-in-vaccines-fact-sheet.pdf

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_vaccine#Use_of_adjuvants

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41573-020-00073-5

https://iamnaturalnana.wordpress.com/2019/11/07/mrc-5-know-what-that-is/

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31604-4/fulltext

Money and Vaccines

Michael Moore 15 November 2020

The MHRA have a tender out. United Kingdom-London, Software Package and Information Systems Contract Award Notice which contains the following text

“The MHRA urgently seeks an artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of COVID -19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs) and ensure that no details from the ADR’s reaction text are missed.”

Does this mean they are expecting a high number of adverse reactions and simply want to know how many there are?

Coincidently, the same day that Pfizer announced the vaccine for Covid will be ready, the CEO, Albert Bourla, sold 5.6 million dollars worth of stock.

I wonder if these two facts are related.

In Australia. Where the vaccine is poised for distribution after a ‘quick’ testing by a company with an impressive track record of being sued for adverse reactions to their skimpily tested drugs (AstraZencca) the Prime Minister has instituted legislation where one CANNOT sue any pharmaceutical company for any vaccination adverse effects. Hmmmm. Now why would you do that?

Perhaps it is because, AstraZeneca plc/AB a British-Swedish multinational pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical company with headquarters in Cambridge, United Kingdom and Södertälje, Sweden, is notoriously corrupt having been fined a total of $1.149 billion over a history of civil and criminal offences including:

• Giving illegal financial inducements to doctors while marketing a prostate cancer drug – misleading consumers into thinking one drug was superior to its older drug, which was losing its patent protection

• Illegally marketing an anti-psychotic drug for uses not approved and failed to adequately describe its risks in an advertisement for the drug in a medical journal

• In 2002 refusing to put a more conspicuous warning label on its lung cancer drug Iressa after several patients in Japan suffered pneumonia and some died

• Misusing patent rules to shield its ulcer drug from generic competitors (fined 60m euros) Acted “unfairly and deceptively” in pricing a prostate cancer drug. Later hit with a $12.9m judgment

• Violating US False Claims Act by failing to provide required rebates to state Medicaid programs

• US subsidiary’s president and chief executive charged with replacing mothers and older female employees with young single women who were pressured into having sex with company executives used of transfer pricing techniques to dodge StgUK500m tax liability

• Committed accounting violations in connection with improper payments made in Russia and China to boost drug sales.

According to Martin Kulldorff a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and a eminent biostatistician and epidemiologist whose research centers on the early detection and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks, opposing lockdowns has stated.

“As history has shown, and as epidemiologists agree, the fastest and most natural way to protect the most vulnerable people is to achieve herd immunity in a community by the more numerous, least vulnerable people catching the virus as soon as possible, suffering just a little, if at all, as this then causes the virus to flame out when it cannot find new, non-immune victims. Accordingly, maskists, by their own logic, are actually slowing the achievement of herd immunity, which exposes the most vulnerable for longer than is otherwise necessary. … It seems to me then that, by maskist logic, they are the ones who are being selfish, since they are not willing to put their health marginally on the line for the benefit of the most vulnerable. I'm tired of being told that we normal people are the selfish ones. I'm also tired of seeing those signs in New York about "We're New York tough" combined with "Wear a mask." Hey New Yorkers, if you were actually tough, then you'd take one for the team, get the virus, suffer some mild symptoms, and help get to herd immunity faster.”

And according to Dr Zoe Harcombe Ph. D

“1) Organisations invested in vaccines make money from vaccines. If people acquire natural immunity, they have reduced or no need for a vaccine and thus the potential gain for the vaccine company is reduced.

2) Locking people in their homes and other lockdown measures will reduce the number of people who acquire natural immunity.

Would this be by design perhaps? Or an error in judgement?

There have been thousands of cases where pharmaceutical companies have had to settle in court for drug adverse reactions. Here are just a few:

1. Vaccine court settlement payouts increased in total $91.2 million in 2015, up from $22.8 million in 2014 to $114 million in 2015 — a 400% increase.

2. Vaccine court settlement payments for flu shots increased the most, from $4.9 million in 2014 to $61 million in 2015 — an increase of more than 1000%, despite autumnal onslaughts every year of media/pr/advertising campaigns urging Americans to ‘get your flu shot,’ with total abandon for the statistical facts coming out of the vaccine court.

3. Varicella (chicken pox) had the third biggest increase — from $0 in 2014 to $5.8 million in 2015. (No surprise shingles is on the rise among the elderly population, as recently vaccinated grandchildren continuously shed live virus to their unsuspecting elders.)

4. Hepatitis B was the fourth largest increase in vaccine court settlements, increasing 321% in 2015 to more than $8 million in 2015 from $1.9 million in 2014.

5. TDap/DTP/DPT and D/T shots were the fifth largest increase, leaping 75% in 2014 from $5.5 million to $9.8.

Since then there have been hundreds of other settlements worth billions of dollars.

There is no doubt that many drugs created do good work. However, drugs that are ‘produced’ quickly without the appropriate measures and tests have been shown to produce some devastating effects.

Producing a drug or vaccine within a year to combat a virus that is relatively mild and which, with herd immunity, would quickly dissipate, according to epidemiologists I hasten to add, not me, leads me to believe there is an ulterior motive for the creation and distribution of a ‘mass’ vaccine for a ‘mass’ vaccination program in which adverse effects are either discounted or simply monitored with no follow up for rectification.

I remain deeply suspicious.

References:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDUIS2kUCbA&feature=emb_logo

https://www.zoeharcombe.com/2020/11/sage-conflicts-of-interest/

https://www.seetvnews.com/post/sutton-and-halton-the-vaccination-game

https://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/reports-statistics

https://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/NVIC-amicus-as-filed-090809.pdf

Please share