• Home

  • About SeeTVNews

  • All News

  • Australian News

  • World News

  • Business

  • Sports News

  • Health

  • Videos

  • Crypto Currency

  • Precious Metals

  • Genral Information

  • Contact

  • Advertise

  • More

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    imageonline-co-transparentimage (6).png

    News, Business, Sport and Opinion Blogs

    • YouTube
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • All Posts
    • Australian News
    • US News
    • Victoria
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Our View
    • Podcasts
    • Sport
    • Health
    • Videos
    • Informational Video
    • Opinion Pieces
    • Sports News
    • Futsal_Serie_A Women
    • Latest News From Europe
    • World News
    • Crypto Currency
    • Precious Metals, Gold & Silver
    • General Information
    • Formula 1
    • Serie A
    • Football
    • Survival
    Search
    • Frank Ziovas
      • Sep 1, 2021
      • 12 min read

    None Dare Call It Conspiracy - The Plan for a New World Order

    Updated: Sep 2, 2021

    Source Gary Allan


    Download The Book Please subscribe and share; Follow us on telegram https://t.me/seetvnews Please support us by registering from FREE on our new uncensored community streaming platform SEETV Network


    Chapter 1 - Don't Confuse Me With Facts


    Most of us have had the experience, either as parents or youngsters, of trying to

    discover the "hidden picture" within another picture in a children's magazine. Usually

    you are shown a landscape with trees, bushes, flowers and other bits of nature.



    The caption reads something like this: "Concealed somewhere in this picture is a donkey

    pulling a cart with a boy in it. Can you find them?" Try as you might, usually you

    could not find the hidden picture until you turned to a page farther back in the

    magazine which would reveal how cleverly the artist had hidden it from us. If we

    study the landscape we realize that the whole picture was painted in such a way as to

    conceal the real picture within, and once we see the "real picture," it stands out like

    the proverbial painful digit.


    We believe the picture painters of the mass media are artfully creating landscapes for

    us which deliberately hide the real picture. In this book we will show you how to

    discover the "hidden picture" in the landscapes presented to us daily through

    newspapers, radio and television. Once you can see through the camouflage, you will

    see the donkey, the cart and the boy who have been there all along.

    Millions of Americans are concerned and frustrated over mishappenings in our nation.

    They feel that something is wrong, drastically wrong, but because of the picture

    painters they can't quite put their fingers on it.


    Maybe you are one of those persons. Something is bugging you, but you aren't sure

    what. We keep electing new Presidents who seemingly promise faithfully to halt the

    world-wide Communist advance, put the blocks to extravagant government spending,

    douse the fires of inflation, put the economy on an even keel, reverse the trend which

    is turning the country into a moral sewer, and toss the criminals into the hoosegow

    where they belong. Yet, despite high hopes and glittering campaign promises, these

    problems continue to worsen no matter who is in office. Each new administration,

    whether it be Republican or Democrat, continues the same basic policies of the

    previous administration which it had so thoroughly denounced during the election

    campaign. It is considered poor form to mention this, but it is true nonetheless. Is

    there a plausible reason to explain why this happens? We are not supposed to think so.

    We are supposed to think it is all accidental and coincidental and that therefore there

    is nothing we can do about it.


    FDR once said "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, you can bet it

    was planned that way." He was in a good position to know. We believe that many of

    the major world events that are shaping our destinies occur because somebody or

    somebodies have planned them that way. If we were merely dealing with the law of

    averages, half of the events affecting our nation's well-being should be good for

    America. If we were dealing with mere incompetence, our leaders should occasionally

    make a mistake in our favor. We shall attempt to prove that we are not really dealing

    with coincidence or stupidity, but with planning and brilliance. This small book deals

    with that planning and brilliance and how it has shaped the foreign and domestic

    policies of the last six administrations. We hope it will explain matters which have up

    to now seemed inexplicable; that it will bring into sharp focus images which have

    been obscured by the landscape painters of the mass media.


    Those who believe that major world events result from planning are laughed at for

    believing in the "conspiracy theory of history." Of course, no one in this modern day

    and age really believes in the conspiracy theory of history -except those who have

    taken the time to study the subject. When you think about it, there are really only two

    theories of history. Either things happen by accident neither planned nor caused by

    anybody, or they happen because they are planned and somebody causes them to

    happen. In reality, it is the "accidental theory of history" preached in the unhallowed

    Halls of Ivy which should be ridiculed. Otherwise, why does every recent

    administration make the same mistakes as the previous ones? Why do they repeat the

    errors of the past which produce inflation, depressions and war? Why does our State

    Department "stumble" from one Communist-aiding "blunder" to another? If you

    believe it is all an accident or the result of mysterious and unexplainable tides of

    history, you will be regarded as an "intellectual" who understands that we live in a

    complex world. If you believe that something like 32,496 consecutive coincidences

    over the past forty years stretches the law of averages a bit, you are a kook!

    Why is it that virtually all "reputable" scholars and mass media columnists and

    commentators reject the cause and effect or conspiratorial theory of history?


    Primarily, most scholars follow the crowd in the academic world just as most women

    follow fashions. To buck the tide means social and professional ostracism. The same

    is true of the mass media. While professors and pontificators profess to be tolerant

    and broadminded, in practice it's strictly a one way street-with all traffic flowing left.

    A Maoist can be tolerated by Liberals of Ivory Towerland or by the Establishment's

    media pundits, but to be a conservative, and a conservative who propounds a

    conspiratorial view, is absolutely verboten. Better you should be a drunk at a national

    WCTU convention!


    Secondly, these people have over the years acquired a strong vested emotional interest

    in their own errors. Their intellects and egos are totally committed to the accidental

    theory. Most people are highly reluctant to admit that they have been conned or have

    shown poor judgment. To inspect the evidence of the existence of a conspiracy

    guiding our political destiny from behind the scenes would force many of these

    people to repudiate a lifetime of accumulated opinions. It takes a person with strong

    character indeed to face the facts and admit he has been wrong even if it was because

    he was uninformed.


    Such was the case with the author of this book. It was only because he set out to prove

    the conservative anti-Communists wrong that he happened to end up writing this

    book. His initial reaction to the conservative point of view was one of suspicion and

    hostility; and it was only after many months of intensive research that he had to admit

    that he had been "conned."

    Politicians and "intellectuals" are attracted to the concept that events are propelled by

    some mysterious tide of history or happen by accident. By this reasoning they hope to

    escape the blame when things go wrong.


    Most intellectuals, pseudo and otherwise, deal with the conspiratorial theory of

    history simply by ignoring it. They never attempt to refute the evidence. It can't be

    refuted. If and when the silent treatment doesn't work, these "objective" scholars and

    mass media opinion molders resort to personal attacks, ridicule and satire. The

    personal attacks tend to divert attention from the facts which an author or speaker is

    trying to expose. The idea is to force the person exposing the conspiracy to stop the

    exposure and spend his time and effort defending himself.


    However, the most effective weapons used against the conspiratorial theory of history

    are ridicule and satire. These extremely potent weapons can be cleverly used to avoid

    any honest attempt at refuting the facts. After all, nobody likes to be made fun of.

    Rather than be ridiculed most people will keep quiet; and, this subject certainly does

    lend itself to ridicule and satire. One technique which can be used is to expand the

    conspiracy to the extent it becomes absurd. For instance, our man from the Halls of

    Poison Ivy might say in a scoffingly arrogant tone, "I suppose you believe every

    liberal professor gets a telegram each morning from conspiracy headquarters

    containing his orders for the day's brainwashing of his students?" Some

    conspiratorialists do indeed overdraw the picture by expanding the conspiracy (from

    the small clique which it is) to include every local knee-jerk liberal activist and

    government bureaucrat. Or, because of racial or religious bigotry, they will take small

    fragments of legitimate evidence and expand them into a conclusion that will support

    their particular prejudice, i.e., the conspiracy is totally "Jewish," "Catholic," or

    "Masonic." These people do not help to expose the conspiracy, but, sadly play into the

    hands of those who want the public to believe that all conspiratorialists are screwballs.

    "Intellectuals" are fond of mouthing clichés like "The conspiracy theory is often

    tempting. However, it is overly simplistic." To ascribe absolutely everything that

    happens to the machinations of a small group of power hungry conspirators is overly

    simplistic. But, in our opinion nothing is more simplistic than doggedly holding onto

    the accidental view of major world events.


    In most cases Liberals simply accuse all those who discuss the conspiracy of being

    paranoid. "Ah, you right wingers," they say, "rustling every bush, kicking over every

    rock, looking for imaginary boogeymen." Then comes the coup de grace-labeling the

    conspiratorial theory as the "devil theory of history." The Liberals love that one. Even

    though it is an empty phrase, it sounds so sophisticated!


    With the leaders of the academic and communications world assuming this sneering

    attitude towards the conspiratorial (or cause and effect) theory of history, it is not

    surprising that millions of innocent and well-meaning people, in a natural desire not to

    appear naive, assume the attitudes and repeat the clichés of the opinion makers. These

    persons, in their attempt to appear sophisticated, assume their mentors' air of smug

    superiority even though they themselves have not spent five minutes in study on the

    subject of international conspiracy.


    The "accidentalists" would have us believe that ascribing any of our problems to

    planning is 'simplistic" and all our problems are caused by Poverty, Ignorance and

    Disease--hereinafter abbreviated as FID. They ignore the fact that organized

    conspirators use PID, real and imagined, as an excuse to build a jail for us all. Most of

    the world has been in PID since time immemorial and it takes incredibly superficial


    thinking to ascribe the ricocheting of the United States government from one disaster

    to another over the past thirty years to PID. "Accidentalists" ignore the fact that some

    of the more advanced nations in the world have been captured by Communists.

    Czechoslovakia was one of the world's most modern industrial nations and Cuba had

    the second highest per capita income of any nation in Central and South America. It is

    not true, however, to state that there are no members of the intellectual elite who

    subscribe to the conspiratorial theory of history. For example, there is Professor

    Carroll Quigley of the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University. Professor

    Quigley can hardly be accused of being a "right wing extremist." (Those three words

    have been made inseparable by the mass media.) Dr. Quigley has all the "liberal"

    credentials, having taught at the Liberal Establishment's academic Mecca's of

    Princeton and Harvard. In his 1300-page, 8 pound tome Tragedy and Hope, Dr,

    Quigley reveals the existence of the conspiratorial network which will be discussed in

    this book. The Professor is not merely formulating a theory, but revealing this

    network's existence from firsthand experience. He also makes it clear that it is only

    the network's secrecy and not their goals to which he objects. Professor Quigley

    discloses:


    "I know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years

    and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret

    records. I HAVE NO AVERSION TO IT OR TO MOST OF ITS AIMS AND HAVE,

    FOR MUCH OF MY LIFE, BEEN CLOSE TO IT AND TO MANY OF ITS

    INSTRUMENTS. I have objected, both in the past and recently, to a few of its

    policies ... but in general my chief difference of opinion is that IT WISHES TO

    REMAIN UNKNOWN, and I believe its role in history is significant enough to be

    known." (Emphasis added)

    We agree, its role in history does deserve to be known. That is why we have written

    this book. However, we most emphatically disagree with this network's aim which the

    Professor describes as "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control

    in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the

    economy of the world as a whole." In other words, this power mad clique wants to

    control and rule the world. Even more-frightening, they want total control over all

    individual actions. As Professor Quigley observes: "... his [the individual's] freedom

    and choice will be controlled within very narrow alternatives by the fact that he will

    be numbered from birth and followed, as a number, through his educational training,

    his required military or other public service, his tax contributions, his health and

    medical requirements, and his final retirement and death benefits." It wants control

    over all natural resources, business, banking and transportation by controlling the

    governments of the world. In order to accomplish these aims the conspirators have

    had no qualms about fomenting wars, depressions and hatred. They want a monopoly

    which would eliminate all competitors and destroy the free enterprise system. And

    Professor Quigley, of Harvard, Princeton and Georgetown approves!

    Professor Quigley is not the only academic who is aware of the existence of a clique

    of serf-perpetuating conspirators whom we shall call Insiders. Other honest scholars

    finding the same individuals at the scenes of disastrous political fires over and over

    again have concluded that there is obviously an organization of pyromaniacs at work

    in the world. But these intellectually honest scholars realize that if they challenged the

    Insiders head-on, their careers would be destroyed. The author knows these men exist

    because he has been in contact with some of them.


    There are also religious leaders who are aware of the existence of this conspiracy. In a

    UPI story dated December 27, 1965, Father Pedro Arrupe, head of the Jesuit Order of

    the Roman Catholic Church, made the following charges during his remarks to the

    Ecumenical Council:

    "This .. . Godless society operates in an extremely efficient manner at least in its

    higher levels of leadership. It makes use of every possible means at its disposal, be

    they scientific, technical, social or economic. It follows a perfectly mapped-out

    strategy. It holds almost complete sway in international organizations, in financial

    circles, in the field of mass communications; press, cinema, radio and television."

    There are a number of problems to be overcome in convincing a person of the

    possible existence of a conspiratorial clique of Insiders who from the very highest

    levels manipulate government policy. In this case truth is really stranger than fiction.

    We are dealing with history's greatest "whodunit," a mystery thriller which puts Erie

    Stanley Gardner to shame. If you love a mystery, you'll be fascinated with the study

    of the operations of the Insiders. If you do study this network of which Professor

    Quigley speaks, you will find that what had at first seemed incredible not only exists,

    but heavily influences our lives.


    It must be remembered that the first job of any conspiracy, whether it be in politics,

    crime or within a business office, is to convince everyone else that no conspiracy

    exists. The conspirators success will be determined largely by their ability to do this.


    That the elite of the academic world and mass communications media always pooh-

    pooh the existence of the Insiders merely serves to camouflage their operations. These


    "artists" hide the boy, the cart and the donkey.

    Probably at some time you have been involved with or had personal knowledge of

    some event which was reported in the news. Perhaps it concerned an athletic event, an

    election, a committee or your business. Did the report contain the "real" story, the

    story behind the story? Probably not. And for a variety of reasons. The reporter had

    time and space problems and there is a good chance the persons involved deliberately

    did not reveal all the facts. Possibly the reporter's own prejudices governed what facts

    went into the story and which were deleted. Our point is that most people know from

    personal experience that a news story often is not the whole story. But many of us

    assume that our own case is unique when really it is typical. What is true about the

    reporting of local events is equally as true about the reporting of national and

    international events.


    Psychological problems are also involved in inducing people to look at the evidence

    concerning the Insiders. People are usually comfortable with their old beliefs and

    conceptions. When Columbus told people the world was a ball and not a pancake,

    they were highly upset. They were being asked to reject their way of thinking of a

    lifetime and adopt a whole new outlook. The "intellectuals" of the day scoffed at

    Columbus and people were afraid they would lose social prestige if they listened to

    him. Many others just did not want to believe the world was round. It complicated too

    many things. And typical flat-earthers had such a vested interest involving their own


    egos, that they heaped abuse on Columbus for challenging their view of the universe.

    "Don't confuse us with facts; our minds are made up," they said.

    These same factors apply today. Because the Establishment controls the media,

    anyone exposing the Insiders will be the recipient of a continuous fusillade of

    invective from newspapers, magazines, TV and radio. In this manner one is

    threatened with loss of "social respectability" if he dares broach the idea that there is

    organization behind any of the problems currently wracking America. Unfortunately,

    for many people social status comes before intellectual honesty. Although they would

    never admit it, social position is more important to many people than is the survival of

    freedom in America.


    If you ask these people which is more important- social respectability or saving their

    children from slavery -they will tell you the latter, of course. But their actions (or lack

    of same) speak so much louder than their words. People have an infinite capacity for

    rationalization when it comes to refusing to face the threat to America's survival.

    Deep down these people are afraid they may be laughed at if they take a stand, or may

    be denied an invitation to some social climber's cocktail party. Instead of getting mad

    at the Insiders, these people actually get angry at those who are trying to save the

    country by exposing the conspirators.


    One thing which makes it so hard for some socially minded people to assess the

    conspiratorial evidence objectively is that the conspirators come from the very highest

    social strata. They are immensely wealthy, highly educated and extremely cultured.

    Many of them have lifelong reputations for philanthropy. Nobody enjoys being put in

    the position of accusing prominent people of conspiring to enslave their fellow

    Americans, but the facts are inescapable. Many business and professional people axe

    particularly vulnerable to the "don't jeopardize your social respectability" pitch given

    by those who don't want the conspiracy exposed. The Insiders know that if the

    business and professional community will not take a stand to save the private

    enterprise system, the socialism through which they intend to control the world will

    be inevitable. They believe that most business and professional men are too shallow

    and decadent, too status conscious, too tied up in the problems of their jobs and

    businesses to worry about what is going on in politics. These men are told that it

    might be bad for business or jeopardize their government contracts if they take a

    stand. They have been bribed into silence with their own tax monies!


    We are hoping that the conspirators have underestimated the courage and patriotism

    remaining in the American people. We feel there are a sufficient number of you who

    are not mesmerized by the television set, who put God, family and country above

    social status, who will band together to expose and destroy the conspiracy of the

    Insiders. The philosopher Diogenes scoured the length and breadth of ancient Greece

    searching for an honest man. We are scouring the length and breadth of America in

    search of hundreds of thousands of intellectually honest men and women who are

    willing to investigate facts and come to logical conclusions-no matter how unpleasant

    those conclusions may be.



    None Dare Call It Conspiracy - Gary Allen
    .pdf
    Download PDF • 2.16MB





    • Australian News
    • •
    • Politics
    • •
    • World News
    313 views0 comments
    • Frank Ziovas
      • Apr 29, 2021
      • 1 min read

    MANY DOCTORS AND NURSES SPEAK OUT TO WARN OF THE DANGERS TO THOSE TAKING THE "VACCINE"

    30 April 2021 | Please share and subscribe help us get the truth out there!




    • Australian News
    • •
    • US News
    • •
    • Victoria
    30 views0 comments
    • Michael Moore
      • Apr 22, 2021
      • 6 min read

    EUGENICIST PREDICTED SCAMDEMIC & ‘GENOCIDE OF THE USELESS’

    23 April 2021 - Michael Moore email: michael.moore@seetvnews.com

    Please subscribe and share and help us get the truth out there!


    If you cannot bring yourself to see that the eugenicists have found a way to assume control of the planet here are some facts. Look if you dare!


    The following was stated as long ago as 1981 by the international banker and proud eugenicist, Jacques Attali, during Interviews with Michel Salomon in The ‘Faces of the Future,’ Seghers edition, published in France by Emi Lit when Attali was a senior adviser to French


    President, Francoise Mitterand:

    “In the future it will be a question of finding a way to reduce the population. We will start with the old, because as soon as it exceeds 60-65 years man lives longer than he produces and costs society dearly, then the weak and then the useless who do nothing for society because there will be more and more of them, and especially the stupid ones.
    Euthanasia targeting these groups; euthanasia will have to be an essential instrument of our future societies, in all cases. We cannot of course execute people or set up camps. We will get rid of them by making them believe it is for their own good.
    Too large a population, and for the most part unnecessary, is something economically too expensive. Socially, it is also much better for the human machine to come to an abrupt halt rather than gradually deteriorating. We won’t be able to run intelligence tests on millions and millions of people, you can imagine!
    We will find something or cause it, a pandemic that targets certain people, a real economic crisis or not, a virus that will affect the old or the fat, it doesn’t matter, the weak will succumb to it, the fearful and the stupid will believe it and ask to be treated.
    We will have taken care to have planned the treatment, a treatment that will be the solution.
    The selection of idiots will thus be done on its own: they will go to the slaughterhouse on their own.”
    The Weapons of Hyperconflict

    What is eugenics? And what is a Eugenicist? Francis Galton (Charles Darwin’s cousin) was perhaps one of the most well-known eugenicists who coined the term in 1833 in his book “Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development”


    Eugenics made its first official appearance in American history through marriage laws. In 1896, Connecticut made it illegal for people with epilepsy or who were “feeble-minded” to marry. Then in 1903, the American Breeder’s Association was created to study eugenics.

    John Harvey Kellogg, of Kellogg cereal fame, an avowed eugenicist, set up the Race Betterment Foundation in 1911 and established a “pedigree registry.” The foundation hosted national conferences on eugenics in 1914, 1915 and 1928.


    Prominent citizens, scientists and socialists joined the cause and established the Eugenics Record Office. This office tracked families and their genetic traits and claiming most people considered unfit were immigrants, minorities or poor.

    The Eugenics Record Office also maintained that, “there was clear evidence that supposed negative family traits were caused by bad genes, not racism, economics or the social views of the time.”


    Now we come to the actions of eugenicists. Specifically, Forced Sterilizations

    Eugenics in America took a dark turn in the early 20th century, led by California. From 1909 to 1979, around 20,000 sterilizations occurred in California state mental institutions under the guise of ‘protecting society from the offspring of people with mental illness.’

    Many sterilizations were forced and performed on minorities. Thirty-three states would eventually allow involuntary sterilization in whomever lawmakers deemed unworthy to procreate.


    In fact, in 1927, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that forced sterilization of the handicapped does not violate the U.S. Constitution. In the words of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes, “…three generations of imbeciles are enough.”

    In 1942, the ruling was overturned, but by then, thousands of people underwent the procedure.


    In the 1930s, the governor of Puerto Rico, Menendez Ramos, implemented sterilization programs for Puerto Rican women. Ramos claimed the action was needed to battle rampant poverty and economic strife; however, it may have also been a way to prevent the so-called superior Aryan gene pool from becoming tainted with Latino blood.


    ‘According to a 1976 Government Accountability Office investigation, between 25 and 50 percent of Native Americans were sterilized between 1970 and 1976. It’s thought some sterilizations happened without consent during other surgical procedures such as an appendectomy.’

    In some cases, health care for living children was denied unless their mothers agreed to sterilization.

    Adolf Hitler and Eugenics


    Pretty much everyone knows the story of Hitler and the forced sterilization in America was, nothing compared to Adolf Hitler’s eugenic experiments leading up to and during World War II. And did Hitler come up with the concept of a superior Aryan race all on his own? Oh no. In fact, he referred to American eugenics in his 1934 book, Mein Kampf.

    In his book, Hitler declares non-Aryan races such as Jews and gypsies as inferior. He believed Germans should do everything possible, including genocide, to make sure their gene pool stayed pure. And in 1933, the Nazis created the Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring which resulted in thousands of forced sterilizations.

    By 1940, Hitler’s master-race mania embarked on the eugenics dream, the ‘final solution’ as hundreds of thousands of Germans with mental or physical disabilities were euthanized by gas or lethal injection.

    Josef Mengele – An enthusiastic Eugenicist.


    During World War II, concentration camp prisoners endured horrific medical tests under the guise of helping Hitler create the perfect race. Josef Mengele, an SS doctor at Auschwitz, oversaw many experiments on both adult and child twins.

    For example, He used chemical eye drops to try and create blue eyes, injected prisoners with devastating diseases and performed surgery without anaesthesia. Many of his “patients” died or suffered permanent disability, and his gruesome experiments earned him the nickname, “Angel of Death.”


    In all, it’s estimated eleven million people died during the Holocaust, most of them because they didn’t fit Hitler’s definition of a superior race. Which brings us to:

    Genetic Engineering


    Thanks to the unspeakable atrocities of Hitler and the Nazis, eugenics lost momentum in after World War II, although forced sterilizations still happened. But as medical technology advanced, a new form of eugenics came on the scene. Modern eugenics, better known as human genetic engineering (as distinct to GMO), changes or removes genes to prevent disease, cure disease or improve your body in some significant way. The potential health benefits of human gene therapy are staggering since many devastating or life-threatening illnesses could be cured. This is done through mRMA therapy to change the DNA of an individual. And, like any tool, it can be used for abuse as well as help.

    But modern genetic engineering also comes with a potential cost. As technology advances, people could routinely weed-out what they consider undesirable traits in their offspring. Genetic testing already allows parents to identify some diseases in their child in utero which may cause them to kill the baby in the womb.


    This is controversial since what exactly constitutes “negative traits” is open to interpretation, and many people feel that all humans have the right to be born regardless of disease, or that the laws of nature shouldn’t be tampered with. This flies in the face of many religious beliefs.

    This brings us to the present day and the ever expanding eugenicists program currently in progress.


    Known eugenicists include:

    • Marie Stopes

    • H. G. Wells

    • Helen Keller

    • George Bernard Shaw

    • Winston Churchill

    • William Beveridge

    • Theodore Roosevelt

    • Jacques Cousteau

    • John Maynard Keyes

    • Bertram Russell

    • Henry Kissinger

    • Bill Gates (His parents were avowed Eugenicists and he was raised as such),

    • Dick Smith (Australia)

    To name but a few.

    Eugenics, based on flawed theories of genetics, was academically acceptable in the 1930s. For example, Professor Agar of Melbourne University was elected chairman of the provisional committee of the Racial Hygiene Society of Victoria in October 1936. It makes the basic assumption that man is a meat body and not a spiritual being. This flies in the face of billions of people’s belief that they are a spiritual being (regardless of the label used).


    In the professor’s 1937 speech to the inaugural meeting of the Eugenics Society at Scots Hall in Melbourne, he emphasised that the most serious problem the Society might address was

    "... the extreme disparity between the fertility rate of the two classes of society-those of superior natural endowments, intellectual and physical, and those of inferior qualities of mind and body."


    Currently, as we have seen, many top influential people are known eugenicists and have embarked on a campaign to reduce the world’s population using the time honoured propaganda tools such as fear and mystery. Justifying it with the PR tool that what is left will be the best of the best. A master race if you will. In this case fear of a virus one cannot see and a blanket ‘medication’ which, by test, has shown to be ineffective in preventing one catching and passing on the self-same virus. Said gene therapy has been shown to have so many dangerous adverse effects to the point where many people are now not showing up for the ‘vaccine. At a recent bulk vaccination centre in Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, hardly anyone showed up. But sad to say, most people will ‘go along with it, either by reason of apathy or not thinking for themselves or consider it too unbelievable that others would think that way. In many cases many will not look at it because they cannot confront evil and would rather pretend it is not happening and will devoid themselves of the responsibility of looking.


    The Sars virus is a godsend to the eugenicist. It is the weapon they have been looking for. It is perfect. No one can say it does not exist. The program is now so all-encompassing the entire planet is caught up in agreement with it. Fear of the unknown is the best fear of all.



    Time to change that.


    References:

    https://www.thebernician.net/globalist-banker-predicted-scamdemic-genocide-of-the-useless https://www.history.com/topics/germany/eugenics#section_1/

    https://flashbak.com/top-ten-unlikely-and-surprising-eugenicists-32300/

    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-04-20/worker-at-auckland-airport-tests-positive-for-covid-19/100081416

    https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/earshot/mind-your-genes-the-dark-legacy-of-eugenics-lives-on/7686464

    https://independentaustralia.net/politics/politics-display/the-legacy-of-eugenics-and-racism,12333

    • Australian News
    • •
    • US News
    • •
    • Victoria
    107 views0 comments
    1
    2

    Back to Top

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter 

    Thanks for Subscribing!

    • YouTube
    • Twitter
    • LinkedIn
    JulienAssange25.png

    SEE TV NETWORK

    By becoming a member of www.seetvnetwork.com you are helping free Julian Assange as 25% of your Membership will go directly to Save Julian Assange fund. Membership is only $4.95 Per Month with over 20000 hours of content from Movies, TV Series, Documentaries, Podcasts European Football and much more!

     

    All proceeds go directly to Julian Assange Fund please type in the code JulianAssange25

    • Home

    • About SeeTVNews

    • All News

    • Australian News

    • World News

    • Business

    • Sports News

    • Health

    • Videos

    • Crypto Currency

    • Precious Metals

    • Genral Information

    • Contact

    • Advertise

    • More

      Use tab to navigate through the menu items.

       Privacy Statement     Liability Statement     Terms of Service

      © 2021 by SeeTVNews. All rights reserved