MIDDLE EAST CONFLICTS

19 May 2021 | Michael Moore Email: michael.moore@seetvnews.com

Please share and subscribe and help us get the truth out there!


"INSANITY IS THE OVERT OR COVERT BUT ALWAYS COMPLEX AND CONTINUOUS DETERMINATION TO HARM OR DESTROY." LRH




If one can step back and look at the current conflicts in the middle east, from an exterior viewpoint, certain basic principles come to light which explain each situation and might even lead to a way that offers a resolution to the conflict.


Understanding the basic concepts that cause conflict is the first step.

If Chaldea could vanish, if Babylon turn to dust, if Egypt could become a badlands, if Sicily could have 160 prosperous cities and be a looted ruin before the year zero and a near desert ever since-and all this in SPITE of all the work and wisdom and good wishes and intent of human beings, then it must follow as the dark follows sunset that something must be unknown to Man concerning all his works and ways. And that this something must be so deadly and so pervasive as to destroy all his ambitions and his chances long before their time.


Such a thing would have to be some natural law unguessed at. And there is such a law, apparently, that answers these conditions of being deadly, unknown, and embracing all activities.


The law would seem to be:


A THIRD PARTY MUST BE PRESENT AND UNKNOWN IN EVERY QUARREL FOR A CONFLICT TO EXIST. or FOR A QUARREL TO OCCUR, AN UNKNOWN THIRD PARTY MUST BE ACTIVE IN PRODUCING IT BETWEEN TWO POTENTIAL OPPONENTS. or WHILE IT IS COMMONLY BELIEVED TO TAKE TWO TO MAKE A FIGHT, A THIRD PARTY MUST EXIST AND MUST DEVELOP IT FOR ACTUAL CONFLICT TO OCCUR.


It is very easy to see that two in conflict are fighting. They are very visible. What is harder to see or suspect is that a third party existed and actively promoted the quarrel. Authoritively telling Peter that Paul is bad and then telling Peter that Paul is bad so that Peter and Paul look at each other and so the conflict begins. The usually unsuspected and "reasonable" third party, the bystander who denies any part of it is the one that brought the conflict into existence in the first place. The hidden third party, seeming at times to be a supporter of only one side, is to be found as the instigator.


It is the cause of war.


One sees two fellows shouting bad names at each other, sees them come to blows. No one else is around. So they, of course, "caused the fight". But there was a third party. Asking questions of each about what was said to them about the other party and who said it. Tracing these down, one comes upon incredible data. That is the trouble. Incredible is too easily rejected. One way to hide things is to make them incredible. Looking at this and looking at the Middle East conflict between Israel and Palestine some observations come to light.


Firstly we need to isolate the actual conflict. This is not between Israelis and Palestinians. But between specific groups, and possibly individuals, within those nations. On the Israeli side we have the Zionist movement, hell bent on eliminating Palestine from the face of the earth. This group, despite its power over the Israeli government does not represent all Israelis. In fact, what is not reported in the media is that many Israelis protest the war against Palestine. On the Palestine side we have the Hamas group within Palestine continuously creating the war with Israel.


So why?


Let's look at the third party. Does this just have to be a person or organisation in present time? Or could it be an entity, person or group in the past which has had an overwhelming influence upon one or both parties involved in a conflict?

But it is very likely that there is a third party in present time actively promoting these conflicts. It is known that the US Government funds Israel to the tune of Billions of dollars. What may not be generally known is that the CIA also has funded Hamas along with other terrorist groups, such as ISIS. It is now known they funded and trained terrorists such as Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein. Then funded the defence against those groups. This makes them a third party in those instances.


There is more but the point is well illustrated by the adoption by the Zionist state of the German Nazi movement who effectively show the Jews, during World War II, who the winning side was. Having had it demonstrated so effectively to them, the Israeli nation is now dramatizing that identity and embarking on a program of eradicating the people and nation of Palestine. (As an aside, any Palestinians surviving this attempted genocide will, by adopting the winning ‘side,’ in all likelihood, perpetuate this upon another suffering nation.

Not all down to them of course. Hamas, being funded with rockets and other weapons of war by arms dealers (most of which are US) is being urged to continuously provoke Israel so they will continue to batter at Palestine until it is completely gone. So, we have a never ending tit for tat in which The Zionists and Hamas are not affected but thousands of innocent civilian men, women and small children are bombed, injured and tortured. Only a pervert can justify that.


And so, the Nazi identity continues.

Who is profiting by this? Certainly not the civilian populations of all these nations who live in perpetual fear and misery and being 'educated' into believing the opposite side is the enemy.


In the case of Israel/Palestine one could say that the third party is the Nazi regime. But it is more than that. That identity is being validated and continuously pushed in order to achieve some specific purpose.


Here is a possible, no, more like probable third party. Arms Sales by the USA and Russia

Brokering 'peace deals' and cease fires, albeit temporary, will not resolve the situation as they reside over a lie. That the two opposing forces are really opposed to each other. One has to observe the situation. This is not done by reacting to the actions of the other side. That simply makes them right in their own eyes and so the conflict persists.

Finding out the WHO behind the conflict would be the next step. This means getting other specific parties who are controlling their side of the conflict.


Quarrels between an individual and an organisation are nearly always caused by an individual third party or a third group. The organisation and the individual should get together and isolate the third party by displaying to each other all the data they each have been fed. Rioters and governments alike could be brought back to agreement. One could get representatives of both to give each other what they have been told by whom.


PREVIOUSLY SUCH CONFERENCES HAVE TENDED TO DEAL ONLY IN RECRIMINATIONS OR CONDITIONS OR ABUSES. THEY MUST DEAL IN BEINGS ONLY IN ORDER TO SUCCEED.

This theory might be thought to assert also that there are no bad conditions that cause conflict. There are. But these are usually REMEDIAL BY CONFERENCE UNLESS A THIRD PARTY IS PROMOTING CONFLICT. In history we have a very foul opinion of the past because it is related by recriminations of two opponents and has not spotted the third party. "Underlying causes" of war should read "hidden promoters". There are no conflicts which cannot be resolved unless the true promoters of them remain hidden.


Seeking out and acknowledging who the third-party is would resolve the conflicts, bring order to the area, reduce the fear and misery and deaths. Asking the question, who benefits most, out of the conflict is a good start. And who protests asking this question is another.

But it would take great courage for the parties involved to do so, especially for the party that originated such a course of action. They would have to acknowledge that they would be right in doing so instead of being ‘right’ in perpetuating the conflict of war.


Because in war there are no winners. Even the hidden promoters are destroying their own future.

~oo00oo~


41 views0 comments

News